<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="pcep.xsl"?>
<?xml-model href="pcep.rng" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0" ?>
<registry xmlns="http://www.iana.org/assignments" id="pcep">
  <title>Path Computation Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers</title>
  <created>2008-12-19</created>
  <updated>2026-04-03</updated>
  
  <registry id="pcep-messages">
    <title>PCEP Messages</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    <range>
      <value>0-251</value>
      <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    </range>
    <range>
      <value>252-255</value>
      <registration_rule>Experimental Use</registration_rule>
    </range>
    <record>
      <value>0</value>
      <description>Reserved</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>1</value>
      <description>Open</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>2</value>
      <description>Keepalive</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>3</value>
      <description>Path Computation Request</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>4</value>
      <description>Path Computation Reply</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>5</value>
      <description>Notification</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>6</value>
      <description>Error</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>7</value>
      <description>Close</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>8</value>
      <description>Path Computation Monitoring Request (PCMonReq)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5886"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>9</value>
      <description>Path Computation Monitoring Reply (PCMonRep)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5886"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27" updated="2017-06-26">
      <value>10</value>
      <description>Report</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27" updated="2017-06-26">
      <value>11</value>
      <description>Update</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27" updated="2017-10-18">
      <value>12</value>
      <description>LSP Initiate Request</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8281"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-09-07">
      <value>13</value>
      <description>StartTLS</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8253"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>14-251</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>252-255</value>
      <description>Experimental Use</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8356"/>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="pcep-objects">
    <title>PCEP Objects</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    <xref type="rfc-errata" data="4956"/>
    <range>
      <value>0-247</value>
      <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    </range>
    <range>
      <value>248-255</value>
      <registration_rule>Experimental Use</registration_rule>
    </range>
    <record>
      <class-value>0</class-value>
      <class-description>Reserved</class-description>
      <type-value>0-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
      <xref type="rfc-errata" data="4956"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>1</class-value>
      <class-description>OPEN</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
      <xref type="rfc-errata" data="4956"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>1</class-value>
      <class-description>OPEN</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>Open</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>1</class-value>
      <class-description>OPEN</class-description>
      <type-value>2-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>2</class-value>
      <class-description>RP</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
      <xref type="rfc-errata" data="4956"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>2</class-value>
      <class-description>RP</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>Request Parameters</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>2</class-value>
      <class-description>RP</class-description>
      <type-value>2-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>3</class-value>
      <class-description>NO-PATH</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
      <xref type="rfc-errata" data="4956"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>3</class-value>
      <class-description>NO-PATH</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>No Path</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>3</class-value>
      <class-description>NO-PATH</class-description>
      <type-value>2-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>4</class-value>
      <class-description>END-POINTS</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
      <xref type="rfc-errata" data="4956"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>4</class-value>
      <class-description>END-POINTS</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>IPv4 addresses</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>4</class-value>
      <class-description>END-POINTS</class-description>
      <type-value>2</type-value>
      <type-description>IPv6 addresses</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record updated="2017-10-16">
      <class-value>4</class-value>
      <class-description>END-POINTS</class-description>
      <type-value>3</type-value>
      <type-description>IPv4</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8306"/>
    </record>
    <record updated="2017-10-16">
      <class-value>4</class-value>
      <class-description>END-POINTS</class-description>
      <type-value>4</type-value>
      <type-description>IPv6</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8306"/>
    </record>
    <record updated="2019-12-17">
      <class-value>4</class-value>
      <class-description>END-POINTS</class-description>
      <type-value>5</type-value>
      <type-description>Generalized Endpoint</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779">RFC8779, Section 2.5</xref>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>4</class-value>
      <class-description>END-POINTS</class-description>
      <type-value>6-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>5</class-value>
      <class-description>BANDWIDTH</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
      <xref type="rfc-errata" data="4956"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>5</class-value>
      <class-description>BANDWIDTH</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>Requested bandwidth</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>5</class-value>
      <class-description>BANDWIDTH</class-description>
      <type-value>2</type-value>
      <type-description>Bandwidth of an existing TE LSP for which a reoptimization is requested</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <class-value>5</class-value>
      <class-description>BANDWIDTH</class-description>
      <type-value>3</type-value>
      <type-description>Generalized bandwidth</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779">RFC8779, Section 2.3</xref>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <class-value>5</class-value>
      <class-description>BANDWIDTH</class-description>
      <type-value>4</type-value>
      <type-description>Generalized bandwidth of an existing TE-LSP for
        which a reoptimization is requested</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779">RFC8779, Section 2.3</xref>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>5</class-value>
      <class-description>BANDWIDTH</class-description>
      <type-value>5-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>6</class-value>
      <class-description>METRIC</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
      <xref type="rfc-errata" data="4956"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>6</class-value>
      <class-description>METRIC</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>Metric</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>6</class-value>
      <class-description>METRIC</class-description>
      <type-value>2-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>7</class-value>
      <class-description>ERO</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
      <xref type="rfc-errata" data="4956"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>7</class-value>
      <class-description>ERO</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>Explicit Route</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>7</class-value>
      <class-description>ERO</class-description>
      <type-value>2-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>8</class-value>
      <class-description>RRO</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
      <xref type="rfc-errata" data="4956"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>8</class-value>
      <class-description>RRO</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>Recorded Route</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>8</class-value>
      <class-description>RRO</class-description>
      <type-value>2-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>9</class-value>
      <class-description>LSPA</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
      <xref type="rfc-errata" data="4956"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>9</class-value>
      <class-description>LSPA</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>LSP Attributes</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>9</class-value>
      <class-description>LSPA</class-description>
      <type-value>2-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>10</class-value>
      <class-description>IRO</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
      <xref type="rfc-errata" data="4956"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>10</class-value>
      <class-description>IRO</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>Include Route</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>10</class-value>
      <class-description>IRO</class-description>
      <type-value>2-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>11</class-value>
      <class-description>SVEC</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
      <xref type="rfc-errata" data="4956"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>11</class-value>
      <class-description>SVEC</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>Synchronization Vector</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>11</class-value>
      <class-description>SVEC</class-description>
      <type-value>2-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>12</class-value>
      <class-description>NOTIFICATION</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
      <xref type="rfc-errata" data="4956"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>12</class-value>
      <class-description>NOTIFICATION</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>Notification</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>12</class-value>
      <class-description>NOTIFICATION</class-description>
      <type-value>2-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>13</class-value>
      <class-description>PCEP-ERROR</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
      <xref type="rfc-errata" data="4956"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>13</class-value>
      <class-description>PCEP-ERROR</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>PCEP Error</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>13</class-value>
      <class-description>PCEP-ERROR</class-description>
      <type-value>2-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>14</class-value>
      <class-description>LOAD-BALANCING</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
      <xref type="rfc-errata" data="4956"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>14</class-value>
      <class-description>LOAD-BALANCING</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>Load Balancing</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <class-value>14</class-value>
      <class-description>LOAD-BALANCING</class-description>
      <type-value>2</type-value>
      <type-description>Generalized Load Balancing</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779">RFC8779, Section 2.4</xref>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>14</class-value>
      <class-description>LOAD-BALANCING</class-description>
      <type-value>3-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>15</class-value>
      <class-description>CLOSE</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
      <xref type="rfc-errata" data="4956"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>15</class-value>
      <class-description>CLOSE</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>Close</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>15</class-value>
      <class-description>CLOSE</class-description>
      <type-value>2-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>16</class-value>
      <class-description>PATH-KEY</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5520"/>
      <xref type="rfc-errata" data="4956"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>16</class-value>
      <class-description>PATH-KEY</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>Path Key</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5520"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>16</class-value>
      <class-description>PATH-KEY</class-description>
      <type-value>2-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>17</class-value>
      <class-description>XRO</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5521"/>
      <xref type="rfc-errata" data="4956"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>17</class-value>
      <class-description>XRO</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>Route exclusion</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5521"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>17</class-value>
      <class-description>XRO</class-description>
      <type-value>2-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>18</class-value>
      <class-description>Unassigned</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc-errata" data="4956"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>18</class-value>
      <class-description>Unassigned</class-description>
      <type-value>1-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>19</class-value>
      <class-description>MONITORING</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5886"/>
      <xref type="rfc-errata" data="4956"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>19</class-value>
      <class-description>MONITORING</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>Monitoring</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5886"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>19</class-value>
      <class-description>MONITORING</class-description>
      <type-value>2-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>20</class-value>
      <class-description>PCC-REQ-ID</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5886"/>
      <xref type="rfc-errata" data="4956"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>20</class-value>
      <class-description>PCC-REQ-ID</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>IPV4 Addresses</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5886"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>20</class-value>
      <class-description>PCC-REQ-ID</class-description>
      <type-value>2</type-value>
      <type-description>IPV6 Addresses</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5886"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>20</class-value>
      <class-description>PCC-REQ-ID</class-description>
      <type-value>3-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>21</class-value>
      <class-description>OF</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5541"/>
      <xref type="rfc-errata" data="4956"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>21</class-value>
      <class-description>OF</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>Objective Function</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5541"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>21</class-value>
      <class-description>OF</class-description>
      <type-value>2-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>22</class-value>
      <class-description>CLASSTYPE</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5455"/>
      <xref type="rfc-errata" data="4956"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>22</class-value>
      <class-description>CLASSTYPE</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>Class-Type</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5455"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>22</class-value>
      <class-description>CLASSTYPE</class-description>
      <type-value>2-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>23</class-value>
      <class-description>Unassigned</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc-errata" data="4956"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>23</class-value>
      <class-description>Unassigned</class-description>
      <type-value>1-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>24</class-value>
      <class-description>GLOBAL-CONSTRAINTS</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5557"/>
      <xref type="rfc-errata" data="4956"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>24</class-value>
      <class-description>GLOBAL-CONSTRAINTS</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>Global Constraints</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5557"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>24</class-value>
      <class-description>GLOBAL-CONSTRAINTS</class-description>
      <type-value>2-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>25</class-value>
      <class-description>PCE-ID</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5886"/>
      <xref type="rfc-errata" data="4956"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>25</class-value>
      <class-description>PCE-ID</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>IPV4 Addresses</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5886"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>25</class-value>
      <class-description>PCE-ID</class-description>
      <type-value>2</type-value>
      <type-description>IPV6 Addresses</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5886"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>25</class-value>
      <class-description>PCE-ID</class-description>
      <type-value>3-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>26</class-value>
      <class-description>PROC-TIME</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5886"/>
      <xref type="rfc-errata" data="4956"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>26</class-value>
      <class-description>PROC-TIME</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>PROC-TIME</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5886"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>26</class-value>
      <class-description>PROC-TIME</class-description>
      <type-value>2-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>27</class-value>
      <class-description>OVERLOAD</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5886"/>
      <xref type="rfc-errata" data="4956"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>27</class-value>
      <class-description>OVERLOAD</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>overload</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5886"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>27</class-value>
      <class-description>OVERLOAD</class-description>
      <type-value>2-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record updated="2017-10-17">
      <class-value>28</class-value>
      <class-description>UNREACH-DESTINATION</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8306"/>
    </record>
    <record updated="2017-10-16">
      <class-value>28</class-value>
      <class-description>UNREACH-DESTINATION</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>IPv4</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8306"/>
    </record>
    <record updated="2017-10-16">
      <class-value>28</class-value>
      <class-description>UNREACH-DESTINATION</class-description>
      <type-value>2</type-value>
      <type-description>IPv6</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8306"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>28</class-value>
      <class-description>UNREACH-DESTINATION</class-description>
      <type-value>3-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record updated="2017-10-17">
      <class-value>29</class-value>
      <class-description>SERO</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8306"/>
    </record>
    <record updated="2017-10-16">
      <class-value>29</class-value>
      <class-description>SERO</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>SERO</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8306"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>29</class-value>
      <class-description>SERO</class-description>
      <type-value>2-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record updated="2017-10-17">
      <class-value>30</class-value>
      <class-description>SRRO</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8306"/>
    </record>
    <record updated="2017-10-16">
      <class-value>30</class-value>
      <class-description>SRRO</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>SRRO</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8306"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>30</class-value>
      <class-description>SRRO</class-description>
      <type-value>2-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record updated="2017-10-17">
      <class-value>31</class-value>
      <class-description>BNC</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8306"/>
    </record>
    <record updated="2017-10-16">
      <class-value>31</class-value>
      <class-description>BNC</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>Branch node list</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8306"/>
    </record>
    <record updated="2017-10-16">
      <class-value>31</class-value>
      <class-description>BNC</class-description>
      <type-value>2</type-value>
      <type-description>Non-branch node list</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8306"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>31</class-value>
      <class-description>BNC</class-description>
      <type-value>3-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27" updated="2017-06-27">
      <class-value>32</class-value>
      <class-description>LSP</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27" updated="2017-06-26">
      <class-value>32</class-value>
      <class-description>LSP</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>LSP</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27" updated="2017-06-26">
      <class-value>32</class-value>
      <class-description>LSP</class-description>
      <type-value>2-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27" updated="2017-06-27">
      <class-value>33</class-value>
      <class-description>SRP</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27" updated="2017-06-26">
      <class-value>33</class-value>
      <class-description>SRP</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>SRP</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27">
      <class-value>33</class-value>
      <class-description>SRP</class-description>
      <type-value>2-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record date="2014-01-23" updated="2015-01-12">
      
      <class-value>34</class-value>
      <class-description>VENDOR-INFORMATION</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc7470"/>
      <xref type="rfc-errata" data="4956"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2014-01-23" updated="2015-01-12">
      
      <class-value>34</class-value>
      <class-description>VENDOR-INFORMATION</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>Vendor-Specific Constraints</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc7470"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2014-01-23" updated="2015-01-12">
      
      <class-value>34</class-value>
      <class-description>VENDOR-INFORMATION</class-description>
      <type-value>2-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-09-28">
      <class-value>35</class-value>
      <class-description>BU</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8233"/>
      <xref type="rfc-errata" data="4956"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-09-28">
      <class-value>35</class-value>
      <class-description>BU</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>BU</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8233"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-09-28">
      <class-value>35</class-value>
      <class-description>BU</class-description>
      <type-value>2-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-03-20">
      <class-value>36</class-value>
      <class-description>INTER-LAYER</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8282"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-03-20">
      <class-value>36</class-value>
      <class-description>INTER-LAYER</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>Inter-layer</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8282"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>36</class-value>
      <class-description>INTER-LAYER</class-description>
      <type-value>2-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-03-20">
      <class-value>37</class-value>
      <class-description>SWITCH-LAYER</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8282"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-03-20">
      <class-value>37</class-value>
      <class-description>SWITCH-LAYER</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>Switch-layer</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8282"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>37</class-value>
      <class-description>SWITCH-LAYER</class-description>
      <type-value>2-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-03-20">
      <class-value>38</class-value>
      <class-description>REQ-ADAP-CAP</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8282"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-03-20">
      <class-value>38</class-value>
      <class-description>REQ-ADAP-CAP</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>Req-Adap-Cap</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8282"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>38</class-value>
      <class-description>REQ-ADAP-CAP</class-description>
      <type-value>2-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-03-20">
      <class-value>39</class-value>
      <class-description>SERVER-INDICATION</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8282"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-03-20">
      <class-value>39</class-value>
      <class-description>SERVER-INDICATION</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>Server-indication</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8282"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>39</class-value>
      <class-description>SERVER-INDICATION</class-description>
      <type-value>2-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-10-17" updated="2019-08-02">
      <class-value>40</class-value>
      <class-description>ASSOCIATION</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8697"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-10-17" updated="2019-08-02">
      <class-value>40</class-value>
      <class-description>ASSOCIATION</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>IPv4</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8697"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-10-17" updated="2019-08-02">
      <class-value>40</class-value>
      <class-description>ASSOCIATION</class-description>
      <type-value>2</type-value>
      <type-description>IPv6</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8697"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>40</class-value>
      <class-description>ASSOCIATION</class-description>
      <type-value>3-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record date="2018-04-23">
      <class-value>41</class-value>
      <class-description>S2LS</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8623"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2018-04-23">
      <class-value>41</class-value>
      <class-description>S2LS</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>S2LS</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8623"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>41</class-value>
      <class-description>S2LS</class-description>
      <type-value>2-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-25">
      <class-value>42</class-value>
      <class-description>WA</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8780"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-25">
      <class-value>42</class-value>
      <class-description>WA</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>Wavelength Assignment</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8780"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>42</class-value>
      <class-description>WA</class-description>
      <type-value>2-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record date="2020-11-09">
      <class-value>43</class-value>
      <class-description>FLOWSPEC</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9168"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2020-11-09">
      <class-value>43</class-value>
      <class-description>FLOWSPEC</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>Flow Specification</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9168"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>43</class-value>
      <class-description>FLOWSPEC</class-description>
      <type-value>2-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record date="2021-03-15">
      <class-value>44</class-value>
      <class-description>CCI Object-Type</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9050"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2021-03-15">
      <class-value>44</class-value>
      <class-description>CCI Object-Type</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>MPLS Label</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9050"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-08-14">
      <class-value>44</class-value>
      <class-description>CCI Object-Type</class-description>
      <type-value>2</type-value>
      <type-description>Native IP</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9757"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2024-08-27">
      <class-value>44</class-value>
      <class-description>CCI Object-Type</class-description>
      <type-value>3</type-value>
      <type-description>SR P2MP Policy (TEMPORARY - registered 2024-08-27, extension registered 2025-07-10, expires 2026-08-27)</type-description>
      <xref type="draft" data="draft-ietf-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-11"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>44</class-value>
      <class-description>CCI Object-Type</class-description>
      <type-value>4-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record date="2022-05-09" updated="2026-04-03">
      <class-value>45</class-value>
      <class-description>PATH-ATTRIB 
        (TEMPORARY - registered 2022-05-09, extension registered 2026-04-03, expires 2027-05-09)
      </class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="draft" data="draft-ietf-pce-multipath-07"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2022-05-09" updated="2026-04-03">
      <class-value>45</class-value>
      <class-description>PATH-ATTRIB 
        (TEMPORARY - registered 2022-05-09, extension registered 2026-04-03, expires 2027-05-09)
      </class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>PATH-ATTRIB</type-description>
      <xref type="draft" data="draft-ietf-pce-multipath-07"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2022-05-09">
      <class-value>45</class-value>
      <class-description>PATH-ATTRIB</class-description>
      <type-value>2-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-08-14">
      <class-value>46</class-value>
      <class-description>BGP Peer Info Object-Type</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9757"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-08-14">
      <class-value>46</class-value>
      <class-description>BGP Peer Info Object-Type</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>IPv4 address</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9757"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-08-14">
      <class-value>46</class-value>
      <class-description>BGP Peer Info Object-Type</class-description>
      <type-value>2</type-value>
      <type-description>IPv6 address</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9757"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-08-14">
      <class-value>46</class-value>
      <class-description>BGP Peer Info Object-Type</class-description>
      <type-value>3-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-08-14">
      <class-value>47</class-value>
      <class-description>Explicit Peer Route Object-Type</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9757"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-08-14">
      <class-value>47</class-value>
      <class-description>Explicit Peer Route Object-Type</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>IPv4 address</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9757"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-08-14">
      <class-value>47</class-value>
      <class-description>Explicit Peer Route Object-Type</class-description>
      <type-value>2</type-value>
      <type-description>IPv6 address</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9757"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-08-14">
      <class-value>47</class-value>
      <class-description>Explicit Peer Route Object-Type</class-description>
      <type-value>3-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-08-14">
      <class-value>48</class-value>
      <class-description>Peer Prefix Advertisement Object-Type</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9757"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-08-14">
      <class-value>48</class-value>
      <class-description>Peer Prefix Advertisement Object-Type</class-description>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>IPv4 address</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9757"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-08-14">
      <class-value>48</class-value>
      <class-description>Peer Prefix Advertisement Object-Type</class-description>
      <type-value>2</type-value>
      <type-description>IPv6 address</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9757"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-08-14">
      <class-value>48</class-value>
      <class-description>Peer Prefix Advertisement Object-Type</class-description>
      <type-value>3-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>49-247</class-value>
      <class-description>Unassigned</class-description>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc-errata" data="4956"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>49-247</class-value>
      <class-description>Unassigned</class-description>
      <type-value>1-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <class-value>248-255</class-value>
      <class-description>Experimental Use</class-description>
      <type-value>0-15</type-value>
      <type-description>Experimental Use</type-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8356"/>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="pcep-message-common-header">
    <title>PCEP Message Common Header Flag Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <note>Bits are numbered from bit 0 as the most significant bit.</note>
    <record>
      <value>0-4</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>  
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="open-object-flag-field">
    <title>Open Object Flag Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <note>Bits are numbered from bit 0 as the most significant bit.</note>
    <record>
      <value>0-4</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>  
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="rp-object">
    <title>RP Object Flag Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <note>Bits are numbered from bit 0 as the most significant bit.</note>
    <record>
      <value>0-14</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record date="2014-06-23">
      <value>15-16</value>
      <description>Routing Granularity (RG)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779">RFC8779, Section 2.2</xref>
    </record>
    <record date="2014-06-23">
      <value>17</value>
      <description>Core-tree computation (C-bit)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc7334"/>
    </record>
    <record updated="2017-10-16">
      <value>18</value>
      <description>Fragmentation (F-bit)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8306"/>
    </record>
    <record updated="2017-10-16">
      <value>19</value>
      <description>P2MP (N-bit)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8306"/>
    </record>
    <record updated="2017-10-16">
      <value>20</value>
      <description>ERO-compression (E-bit)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8306"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>21</value>
      <description>Make-before-break (M-bit)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5557"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>22</value>
      <description>Report the request order (D-bit)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5557"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>23</value>
      <description>Path Key (P-bit)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5520"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>24</value>
      <description>Supply OF on response</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5541"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>25</value>
      <description>VSPT</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5441"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>26</value>
      <description>Strict/Loose</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>27</value>
      <description>Bi-directional</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>28</value>
      <description>Reoptimization</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>29-31</value>
      <description>Priority</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="no-path-object-ni-field">
    <title>NO-PATH Object NI Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record>
      <value>0</value>
      <description>No path satisfying the set of constraints could be found</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>1</value>
      <description>PCE chain broken</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>2-255</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="no-path-object-flag-field">
    <title>NO-PATH Object Flag Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <note>Bits are numbered from bit 0 as the most significant bit.</note>
    <record>
      <value>0</value>
      <description>Unsatisfied constrained indicated</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>1-15</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="metric-object-t-field">
    <title>METRIC Object T Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record>
      <value>0</value>
      <description>Reserved</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>1</value>
      <description>IGP metric</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>2</value>
      <description>TE metric</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>3</value>
      <description>Hop Counts</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>4</value>
      <description>Aggregate bandwidth consumption</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5541"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>5</value>
      <description>Load of the most loaded link</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5541"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>6</value>
      <description>Cumulative IGP cost</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5541"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>7</value>
      <description>Cumulative TE cost</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5541"/>
    </record>
    <record updated="2017-10-16">
      <value>8</value>
      <description>P2MP IGP metric</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8306"/>
    </record>
    <record updated="2017-10-16">
      <value>9</value>
      <description>P2MP TE metric</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8306"/>
    </record>
    <record updated="2017-10-16">
      <value>10</value>
      <description>P2MP hop count metric</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8306"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2015-08-14" updated="2019-03-15">
      <value>11</value>
      <description>Segment-ID (SID) Depth.</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8664"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-09-28">
      <value>12</value>
      <description>Path Delay metric</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8233"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-09-28">
      <value>13</value>
      <description>Path Delay Variation metric</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8233"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-09-28">
      <value>14</value>
      <description>Path Loss metric</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8233"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-09-28">
      <value>15</value>
      <description>P2MP Path Delay metric</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8233"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-09-28">
      <value>16</value>
      <description>P2MP Path Delay variation metric</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8233"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-09-28">
      <value>17</value>
      <description>P2MP Path Loss metric</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8233"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-03-20">
      <value>18</value>
      <description>Number of adaptations on a path</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8282"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-03-20">
      <value>19</value>
      <description>Number of layers on a path</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8282"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-06-13">
      <value>20</value>
      <description>Domain Count metric</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8685"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-06-13">
      <value>21</value>
      <description>Border Node Count metric</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8685"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-09-13" updated="2025-06-12">
      <value>22</value>
      <description>Path Min Delay metric</description>
      <xref type="draft" data="RFC-ietf-pce-sid-algo-29"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-09-13" updated="2025-06-12">
      <value>23</value>
      <description>P2MP Path Min Delay metric</description>
      <xref type="draft" data="RFC-ietf-pce-sid-algo-29"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2024-07-30" updated="2025-06-12">
      <value>24</value>
      <description>Path Bandwidth metric</description>
      <xref type="draft" data="RFC-ietf-pce-sid-algo-29"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2024-07-30" updated="2025-06-12">
      <value>25</value>
      <description>P2MP Path Bandwidth metric</description>
      <xref type="draft" data="RFC-ietf-pce-sid-algo-29"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>26-127</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record date="2024-07-30" updated="2025-06-12">
      <value>128-255</value>
      <description>User-defined metric</description>
      <xref type="draft" data="RFC-ietf-pce-sid-algo-29"/>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="metric-object-flag-field">
    <title>METRIC Object Flag Field</title>
    <note>Bits are numbered from bit 0 as the most significant bit.</note>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record>
      <value>0-5</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>6</value>
      <description>Computed metric</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>7</value>
      <description>Bound</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
  </registry>

  <registry id="lspa-object-flag-field">
    <title>LSPA Object Flag Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <note>Bits are numbered from bit 0 as the most significant bit.</note>
    <record>
      <value>0-5</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record date="2021-01-28" updated="2023-06-30">
      <value>6</value>
      <description>Protection Enforcement</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9488"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>7</value>
      <description>Local Protection Desired</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
  </registry>

  <registry id="iro-subobject">
    <title>IRO Subobjects</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5521"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record>
      <value>1</value>
      <description>IPv4 prefix</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc3209"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>2</value>
      <description>IPv6 prefix</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc3209"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>3</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>4</value>
      <description>Unnumbered Interface ID</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc3477"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2015-12-23" updated="2016-06-08">
      <value>5</value>
      <description>4-byte AS number</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc7897"/>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc7898"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2015-12-23" updated="2016-01-04">
      <value>6</value>
      <description>OSPF Area ID</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc7897"/>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc7898"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2015-12-23" updated="2016-01-04">
      <value>7</value>
      <description>IS-IS Area ID</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc7897"/>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc7898"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-26">
      <value>8</value>
      <description>Optical Interface Class List</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8780"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-26">
      <value>9</value>
      <description>Client Signal Information</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8780"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <value>10</value>
      <description>Label</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>11-31</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>32</value>
      <description>Autonomous system number</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc3209"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>33</value>
      <description>Explicit Exclusion Route subobject (EXRS)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc4874"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>34-127</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
  </registry>

  <registry id="svec-object-flag-field">
    <title>SVEC Object Flag Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <note>Bits are numbered from bit 0 as the most significant bit.</note>
    <record>
      <value>0-17</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-06-13">
      <value>18</value>
      <description>Domain Diverse O-bit</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8685"/>
    </record>
    <record updated="2017-10-16">
      <value>19</value>
      <description>Partial Path Diverse</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8306"/>
    </record>
    <record updated="2017-10-16">
      <value>20</value>
      <description>Link Direction Diverse</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8306"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>21</value>
      <description>SRLG Diverse</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>22</value>
      <description>Node Diverse</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>23</value>
      <description>Link Diverse</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="notification-object">
    <title>Notification Object</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <value-value>1-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Reserved</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>Pending Request cancelled</type-description>
      <value-value>1</value-value>
      <value-description>PCC cancels a set of pending requests</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>Pending Request cancelled</type-description>
      <value-value>2</value-value>
      <value-description>PCE cancels a set of pending requests</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>Pending Request cancelled</type-description>
      <value-value>3-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>2</type-value>
      <type-description>PCE Congestion</type-description>
      <value-value>1</value-value>
      <value-description>PCE in congested state</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>2</type-value>
      <type-description>PCE Congestion</type-description>
      <value-value>2</value-value>
      <value-description>PCE no longer in congested state</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>2</type-value>
      <type-description>PCE Congestion</type-description>
      <value-value>3-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>3</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
      <value-value>1-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-07-27" updated="2017-06-26">
      <type-value>4</type-value>
      <type-description>Stateful PCE resource limit exceeded</type-description>
      <value-value>0</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-07-27" updated="2017-06-23">
      <type-value>4</type-value>
      <type-description>Stateful PCE resource limit exceeded</type-description>
      <value-value>1</value-value>
      <value-description>Entering resource limit exceeded state</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-07-27" updated="2017-06-26">
      <type-value>4</type-value>
      <type-description>Stateful PCE resource limit exceeded</type-description>
      <value-value>2</value-value>
      <value-description>Deprecated</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-07-27" updated="2017-06-26">
      <type-value>4</type-value>
      <type-description>Stateful PCE resource limit exceeded</type-description>
      <value-value>3-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>5</type-value>
      <type-description>Auto-Bandwidth Overwhelm State</type-description>
      <value-value>0</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-10-08">
      <type-value>5</type-value>
      <type-description>Auto-Bandwidth Overwhelm State</type-description>
      <value-value>1</value-value>
      <value-description>Entering Auto-Bandwidth Overwhelm State</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8733"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-10-08">
      <type-value>5</type-value>
      <type-description>Auto-Bandwidth Overwhelm State</type-description>
      <value-value>2</value-value>
      <value-description>Clearing Auto-Bandwidth Overwhelm State</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8733"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>5</type-value>
      <type-description>Auto-Bandwidth Overwhelm State</type-description>
      <value-value>3-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>6-255</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
      <value-value>1-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
    </record>
  </registry>
 
  <registry id="notification-object-flag-field">
    <title>Notification Object Flag Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <note>Bits are numbered from bit 0 as the most significant bit.</note>
    <record>
      <value>0-7</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
  </registry>
 
  <registry id="pcep-error-object">
    <title>PCEP-ERROR Object Error Types and Values</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9756"/>
    <range>
    <value>0-251</value>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <note>The IETF Review procedure applies to all Error-values (0-255) for Error-Types in this range.</note>
    </range>
    <range>
    <value>252-255</value>
    <registration_rule>Experimental Use</registration_rule>
    <note>The Experimental Use policy applies to all Error-values (0-255) for Error-Types in this range.</note>
    </range>
    <record>
      <type-value>0</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved</type-description>
      <value-value>0-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Reserved</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>PCEP session establishment failure</type-description>
      <value-value>0</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>PCEP session establishment failure</type-description>
      <value-value>1</value-value>
      <value-description>reception of an invalid Open message or
        a non Open message.</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>PCEP session establishment failure</type-description>
      <value-value>2</value-value>
      <value-description>no Open message received before the expiration of the OpenWait timer</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>PCEP session establishment failure</type-description>
      <value-value>3</value-value>
      <value-description>unacceptable and non negotiable session characteristics</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>PCEP session establishment failure</type-description>
      <value-value>4</value-value>
      <value-description>unacceptable but negotiable session characteristics</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>PCEP session establishment failure</type-description>
      <value-value>5</value-value>
      <value-description>reception of a second Open message with still unacceptable session characteristics</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>PCEP session establishment failure</type-description>
      <value-value>6</value-value>
      <value-description>reception of a PCErr message proposing unacceptable session characteristics</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>PCEP session establishment failure</type-description>
      <value-value>7</value-value>
      <value-description>No Keepalive or PCErr message received before the expiration of the KeepWait timer</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>PCEP session establishment failure</type-description>
      <value-value>8</value-value>
      <value-description>PCEP version not supported</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>1</type-value>
      <type-description>PCEP session establishment failure</type-description>
      <value-value>9-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>2</type-value>
      <type-description>Capability not supported</type-description>
      <value-value>0-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>3</type-value>
      <type-description>Unknown Object</type-description>
      <value-value>0</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>3</type-value>
      <type-description>Unknown Object</type-description>
      <value-value>1</value-value>
      <value-description>Unrecognized object class</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>3</type-value>
      <type-description>Unknown Object</type-description>
      <value-value>2</value-value>
      <value-description>Unrecognized object Type</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>3</type-value>
      <type-description>Unknown Object</type-description>
      <value-value>3-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>4</type-value>
      <type-description>Not supported object</type-description>
      <value-value>0</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>4</type-value>
      <type-description>Not supported object</type-description>
      <value-value>1</value-value>
      <value-description>Not supported object class</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>4</type-value>
      <type-description>Not supported object</type-description>
      <value-value>2</value-value>
      <value-description>Not supported object Type</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>4</type-value>
      <type-description>Not supported object</type-description>
      <value-value>3</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>4</type-value>
      <type-description>Not supported object</type-description>
      <value-value>4</value-value>
      <value-description>Unsupported parameter</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5441"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-09-28">
      <type-value>4</type-value>
      <type-description>Not supported object</type-description>
      <value-value>5</value-value>
      <value-description>Unsupported network performance constraint</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8233"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <type-value>4</type-value>
      <type-description>Not supported object</type-description>
      <value-value>6</value-value>
      <value-description>BANDWIDTH object type 3 or 4 not supported</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <type-value>4</type-value>
      <type-description>Not supported object</type-description>
      <value-value>7</value-value>
      <value-description>Unsupported endpoint type in END-POINTS Generalized Endpoint object type</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <type-value>4</type-value>
      <type-description>Not supported object</type-description>
      <value-value>8</value-value>
      <value-description>Unsupported TLV present in END-POINTS Generalized Endpoint object type</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <type-value>4</type-value>
      <type-description>Not supported object</type-description>
      <value-value>9</value-value>
      <value-description>Unsupported granularity in the RP object flags</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>4</type-value>
      <type-description>Not supported object</type-description>
      <value-value>10-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>5</type-value>
      <type-description>Policy violation</type-description>
      <value-value>0</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>5</type-value>
      <type-description>Policy violation</type-description>
      <value-value>1</value-value>
      <value-description>C bit of the METRIC object set (request rejected)</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>5</type-value>
      <type-description>Policy violation</type-description>
      <value-value>2</value-value>
      <value-description>O bit of the RP object cleared (request rejected)</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>5</type-value>
      <type-description>Policy violation</type-description>
      <value-value>3</value-value>
      <value-description>objective function not allowed (request rejected)</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5541"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>5</type-value>
      <type-description>Policy violation</type-description>
      <value-value>4</value-value>
      <value-description>OF bit of the RP object set (request rejected)</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5541"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>5</type-value>
      <type-description>Policy violation</type-description>
      <value-value>5</value-value>
      <value-description>Global concurrent optimization not allowed</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5557"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>5</type-value>
      <type-description>Policy violation</type-description>
      <value-value>6</value-value>
      <value-description>Monitoring message supported but rejected due to policy violation</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5886"/>
    </record>
    <record updated="2017-10-16">
      <type-value>5</type-value>
      <type-description>Policy violation</type-description>
      <value-value>7</value-value>
      <value-description>P2MP Path computation is not allowed</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8306"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-09-28">
      <type-value>5</type-value>
      <type-description>Policy violation</type-description>
      <value-value>8</value-value>
      <value-description>Not allowed network performance constraint</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8233"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>5</type-value>
      <type-description>Policy violation</type-description>
      <value-value>9-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>6</type-value>
      <type-description>Mandatory Object missing</type-description>
      <value-value>0</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>6</type-value>
      <type-description>Mandatory Object missing</type-description>
      <value-value>1</value-value>
      <value-description>RP object missing</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>6</type-value>
      <type-description>Mandatory Object missing</type-description>
      <value-value>2</value-value>
      <value-description>RRO missing for a reoptimization request (R bit of the RP object set)</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>6</type-value>
      <type-description>Mandatory Object missing</type-description>
      <value-value>3</value-value>
      <value-description>END-POINTS object missing</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>6</type-value>
      <type-description>Mandatory Object missing</type-description>
      <value-value>4</value-value>
      <value-description>MONITORING object missing</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5886"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>6</type-value>
      <type-description>Mandatory Object missing</type-description>
      <value-value>5-7</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27" updated="2017-06-26">
      <type-value>6</type-value>
      <type-description>Mandatory Object missing</type-description>
      <value-value>8</value-value>
      <value-description>LSP object missing</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27" updated="2017-06-26">
      <type-value>6</type-value>
      <type-description>Mandatory Object missing</type-description>
      <value-value>9</value-value>
      <value-description>ERO object missing</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27" updated="2017-06-26">
      <type-value>6</type-value>
      <type-description>Mandatory Object missing</type-description>
      <value-value>10</value-value>
      <value-description>SRP object missing</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27" updated="2017-06-26">
      <type-value>6</type-value>
      <type-description>Mandatory Object missing</type-description>
      <value-value>11</value-value>
      <value-description>LSP-IDENTIFIERS TLV missing</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-03-28">
      <type-value>6</type-value>
      <type-description>Mandatory Object missing</type-description>
      <value-value>12</value-value>
      <value-description>LSP-DB-VERSION TLV missing</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8232"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2018-04-23">
      <type-value>6</type-value>
      <type-description>Mandatory Object missing</type-description>
      <value-value>13</value-value>
      <value-description>S2LS object missing</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8623"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2018-04-23">
      <type-value>6</type-value>
      <type-description>Mandatory Object missing</type-description>
      <value-value>14</value-value>
      <value-description>P2MP-LSP-IDENTIFIERS TLV missing</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8623"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2020-02-11">
      <type-value>6</type-value>
      <type-description>Mandatory Object missing</type-description>
      <value-value>15</value-value>
      <value-description>DISJOINTNESS-CONFIGURATION TLV missing</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8800"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2020-08-28">
      <type-value>6</type-value>
      <type-description>Mandatory Object missing</type-description>
      <value-value>16</value-value>
      <value-description>Scheduled TLV missing</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8934"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2021-03-11">
      <type-value>6</type-value>
      <type-description>Mandatory Object missing</type-description>
      <value-value>17</value-value>
      <value-description>CCI object missing</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9050"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2022-10-31">
      <type-value>6</type-value>
      <type-description>Mandatory Object missing</type-description>
      <value-value>18</value-value>
      <value-description>VIRTUAL-NETWORK-TLV missing</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9358"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-08-14">
      <type-value>6</type-value>
      <type-description>Mandatory Object missing</type-description>
      <value-value>19</value-value>
      <value-description>Native IP object missing</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9757"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-08-29">
      <type-value>6</type-value>
      <type-description>Mandatory Object missing</type-description>
      <value-value>20</value-value>
      <value-description>LABEL-REQUEST TLV missing</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9504"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2024-02-13">
      <type-value>6</type-value>
      <type-description>Mandatory Object missing</type-description>
      <value-value>21</value-value>
      <value-description>Missing SR Policy Mandatory TLV</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9862"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2025-04-28">
      <type-value>6</type-value>
      <type-description>Mandatory Object missing</type-description>
      <value-value>22</value-value>
      <value-description>Missing SR Policy Association</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9862"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>6</type-value>
      <type-description>Mandatory Object missing</type-description>
      <value-value>23-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>7</type-value>
      <type-description>Synchronized path computation request missing</type-description>
      <value-value>0-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>8</type-value>
      <type-description>Unknown request reference</type-description>
      <value-value>0-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>9</type-value>
      <type-description>Attempt to establish a second PCEP session</type-description>
      <value-value>0-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>0</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>1</value-value>
      <value-description>Reception of an object with P flag not set although the P-flag must be set according to this specification.</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2015-08-14" updated="2019-03-15">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>2</value-value>
      <value-description>Bad label value</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8664"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2015-08-14" updated="2019-03-15">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>3</value-value>
      <value-description>Unsupported number of SR-ERO subobjects</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8664"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2015-08-14" updated="2019-03-15">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>4</value-value>
      <value-description>Bad label format</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8664"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2015-08-14" updated="2019-03-15">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>5</value-value>
      <value-description>ERO mixes SR-ERO subobjects with other subobject types</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8664"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2015-08-14" updated="2019-03-15">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>6</value-value>
      <value-description>Both SID and NAI are absent in the SR-ERO subobject</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8664"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2015-08-14" updated="2019-03-15">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>7</value-value>
      <value-description>Both SID and NAI are absent in the SR-RRO subobject</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8664"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27" updated="2017-10-18">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>8</value-value>
      <value-description>SYMBOLIC-PATH-NAME TLV missing</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8281"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2015-08-14" updated="2019-03-15">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>9</value-value>
      <value-description>MSD exceeds the
        default for the PCEP session</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8664"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2015-08-14" updated="2019-03-15">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>10</value-value>
      <value-description>RRO mixes SR-RRO
        subobjects with other subobject types</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8664"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2015-08-14" updated="2018-05-11">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>11</value-value>
      <value-description>Malformed object</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8408"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-15">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>12</value-value>
      <value-description>Missing PCE-SR-CAPABILITY sub-TLV</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8664"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-15">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>13</value-value>
      <value-description>Unsupported NAI Type in the SR-ERO/SR-RRO subobject</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8664"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-15">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid objectD</type-description>
      <value-value>14</value-value>
      <value-description>Unknown SID</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8664"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-15">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>15</value-value>
      <value-description>NAI cannot be resolved to a SID</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8664"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-15">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>16</value-value>
      <value-description>Could not find SRGB</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8664"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-15">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>UReception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>17</value-value>
      <value-description>SID index exceeds SRGB size</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8664"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-15">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>18</value-value>
      <value-description>Could not find SRLB</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8664"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-15">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>19</value-value>
      <value-description>SID index exceeds SRLB size</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8664"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-15">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>20</value-value>
      <value-description>Inconsistent SIDs in SR-ERO / SR-RRO subobjects</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8664"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-15">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>21</value-value>
      <value-description>MSD must be nonzero</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8664"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-05-10">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>22</value-value>
      <value-description>Mismatch of O field in S2LS and LSP object</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8623"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-06-13">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>23</value-value>
      <value-description>Incompatible OF codes in H-PCE</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8685"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>24</value-value>
      <value-description>Bad BANDWIDTH object type 3 or 4</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>25</value-value>
      <value-description>Unsupported LSP Protection Flags in 
        PROTECTION-ATTRIBUTE TLV</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>26</value-value>
      <value-description>Unsupported Secondary LSP Protection Flags in PROTECTION-ATTRIBUTE TLV</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>27</value-value>
      <value-description>Unsupported Link Protection Type in PROTECTION-ATTRIBUTE TLV</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>28</value-value>
      <value-description>LABEL-SET TLV present with O bit set but without R bit set in RP</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>29</value-value>
      <value-description>Wrong LABEL-SET TLV present with O and L bits set</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>30</value-value>
      <value-description>Wrong LABEL-SET TLV present with O bit set and wrong format</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>31</value-value>
      <value-description>Missing GMPLS-CAPABILITY TLV</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2020-02-11">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>32</value-value>
      <value-description>Incompatible OF code</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8800"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2021-03-11">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>33</value-value>
      <value-description>Missing PCECC Capability sub-TLV</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9050"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2022-01-12" updated="2024-04-16">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>34</value-value>
      <value-description>Missing PCE-SRv6-CAPABILITY sub-TLV</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9603"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2022-01-12" updated="2024-04-16">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>35</value-value>
      <value-description>Both SID and NAI are absent in SRv6-RRO subobject</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9603"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2022-01-12" updated="2024-04-16">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>36</value-value>
      <value-description>RRO mixes SRv6-RRO subobjects with other subobject types</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9603"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2022-01-12" updated="2024-04-16">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>37</value-value>
      <value-description>Invalid SRv6 SID Structure</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9603"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2022-05-09" updated="2026-04-03">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>38</value-value>
      <value-description>Conflicting Path ID
        (TEMPORARY - registered 2022-05-09, extension registered 2026-04-03, expires 2027-05-09)
      </value-description>
      <xref type="draft" data="draft-ietf-pce-multipath-07"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-08-14">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>39</value-value>
      <value-description>PCECC NATIVE-IP-TE-CAPABILITY bit is not set</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9757"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2024-04-16">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>40</value-value>
      <value-description>Unsupported number of SRv6-ERO subobjects</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9603"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2024-04-16">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>41</value-value>
      <value-description>Unsupported NAI Type in the SRv6-ERO/SRv6-RRO subobject</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9603"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2024-04-16">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>42</value-value>
      <value-description>Both SID and NAI are absent in the SRv6-ERO subobject</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9603"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2024-04-16">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>43</value-value>
      <value-description>ERO mixes SRv6-ERO subobjects with other subobject types</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9603"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2025-04-28">
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>44</value-value>
      <value-description>Missing SRPOLICY-CAPABILITY TLV</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9862"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>10</type-value>
      <type-description>Reception of an invalid object</type-description>
      <value-value>45-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>11</type-value>
      <type-description>Unrecognized EXRS subobject</type-description>
      <value-value>0-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5521"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>12</type-value>
      <type-description>Diffserv-aware TE error</type-description>
      <value-value>0</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5455"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>12</type-value>
      <type-description>Diffserv-aware TE error</type-description>
      <value-value>1</value-value>
      <value-description>Unsupported class-type</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5455"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>12</type-value>
      <type-description>Diffserv-aware TE error</type-description>
      <value-value>2</value-value>
      <value-description>Invalid class-type</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5455"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>12</type-value>
      <type-description>Diffserv-aware TE error</type-description>
      <value-value>3</value-value>
      <value-description>Class-Type and setup priority do not form a configured TE-class</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5455"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>12</type-value>
      <type-description>Diffserv-aware TE error</type-description>
      <value-value>4-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>13</type-value>
      <type-description>BRPC procedure completion failure</type-description>
      <value-value>0</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5441"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>13</type-value>
      <type-description>BRPC procedure completion failure</type-description>
      <value-value>1</value-value>
      <value-description>BRPC procedure not supported by one or more PCEs along the domain path</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5441"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>13</type-value>
      <type-description>BRPC procedure completion failure</type-description>
      <value-value>2-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>14</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
      <value-value>0-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>15</type-value>
      <type-description>Global Concurrent Optimization Error</type-description>
      <value-value>0</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5557"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>15</type-value>
      <type-description>Global Concurrent Optimization Error</type-description>
      <value-value>1</value-value>
      <value-description>Insufficient memory</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5557"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>15</type-value>
      <type-description>Global Concurrent Optimization Error</type-description>
      <value-value>2</value-value>
      <value-description>Global concurrent optimization not supported</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5557"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>15</type-value>
      <type-description>Global Concurrent Optimization Error</type-description>
      <value-value>3-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
    </record>
    <record updated="2017-10-16">
      <type-value>16</type-value>
      <type-description>P2MP Capability Error</type-description>
      <value-value>0</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8306"/>
    </record>
    <record updated="2017-10-16">
      <type-value>16</type-value>
      <type-description>P2MP Capability Error</type-description>
      <value-value>1</value-value>
      <value-description>The PCE cannot satisfy the request due to insufficient memory</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8306"/>
    </record>
    <record updated="2017-10-16">
      <type-value>16</type-value>
      <type-description>P2MP Capability Error</type-description>
      <value-value>2</value-value>
      <value-description>The PCE is not capable of P2MP computation</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8306"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>16</type-value>
      <type-description>P2MP Capability Error</type-description>
      <value-value>3-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
    </record>
    <record updated="2017-10-16">
      <type-value>17</type-value>
      <type-description>P2MP END-POINTS Error</type-description>
      <value-value>0</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8306"/>
    </record>
    <record updated="2017-10-16">
      <type-value>17</type-value>
      <type-description>P2MP END-POINTS Error</type-description>
      <value-value>1</value-value>
      <value-description>The PCE cannot satisfy the request due to no END-POINTS with leaf type 2</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8306"/>
    </record>
    <record updated="2017-10-16">
      <type-value>17</type-value>
      <type-description>P2MP END-POINTS Error</type-description>
      <value-value>2</value-value>
      <value-description>The PCE cannot satisfy the request due to no END-POINTS with leaf type 3</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8306"/>
    </record>
    <record updated="2017-10-16">
      <type-value>17</type-value>
      <type-description>P2MP END-POINTS Error</type-description>
      <value-value>3</value-value>
      <value-description>The PCE cannot satisfy the request due to no END-POINTS with leaf type 4
      </value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8306"/>
    </record>
    <record updated="2017-10-16">
      <type-value>17</type-value>
      <type-description>P2MP END-POINTS Error</type-description>
      <value-value>4</value-value>
      <value-description>The PCE cannot satisfy the request due to inconsistent END-POINTS</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8306"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>17</type-value>
      <type-description>P2MP END-POINTS Error</type-description>
      <value-value>5-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
    </record>
    <record updated="2017-10-16">
      <type-value>18</type-value>
      <type-description>P2MP Fragmentation Error</type-description>
      <value-value>0</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8306"/>
    </record>
    <record updated="2017-10-16">
      <type-value>18</type-value>
      <type-description>P2MP Fragmentation Error</type-description>
      <value-value>1</value-value>
      <value-description>Fragmented request failure</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8306"/>
    </record>
    <record updated="2018-04-23">
      <type-value>18</type-value>
      <type-description>P2MP Fragmentation Error</type-description>
      <value-value>2</value-value>
      <value-description>Fragmented Report failure</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8623"/>
    </record>
    <record updated="2018-04-23">
      <type-value>18</type-value>
      <type-description>P2MP Fragmentation Error</type-description>
      <value-value>3</value-value>
      <value-description>Fragmented Update failure</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8623"/>
    </record>
    <record updated="2018-04-23">
      <type-value>18</type-value>
      <type-description>P2MP Fragmentation Error</type-description>
      <value-value>4</value-value>
      <value-description>Fragmented Instantiation failure</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8623"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>18</type-value>
      <type-description>P2MP Fragmentation Error</type-description>
      <value-value>5-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27">
      <type-value>19</type-value>
      <type-description>Invalid Operation</type-description>
      <value-value>0</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
	  <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27" updated="2017-06-26">
      <type-value>19</type-value>
      <type-description>Invalid Operation</type-description>
      <value-value>1</value-value>
      <value-description>Attempted LSP Update Request for a non-delegated
        LSP. The PCEP-ERROR object is followed by the LSP
        object that identifies the LSP.</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27" updated="2017-06-26">
      <type-value>19</type-value>
      <type-description>Invalid Operation</type-description>
      <value-value>2</value-value>
      <value-description>Attempted LSP Update Request if the stateful PCE 
        capability was not advertised.</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27" updated="2017-06-26">
      <type-value>19</type-value>
      <type-description>Invalid Operation</type-description>
      <value-value>3</value-value>
      <value-description>Attempted LSP Update Request for an LSP identified 
        by an unknown PLSP-ID.</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27">
      <type-value>19</type-value>
      <type-description>Invalid Operation</type-description>
      <value-value>4</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27" updated="2017-06-26">
      <type-value>19</type-value>
      <type-description>Invalid Operation</type-description>
      <value-value>5</value-value>
      <value-description>Attempted LSP State Report if active 
        stateful PCE capability was not advertised.</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27" updated="2017-10-18">
      <type-value>19</type-value>
      <type-description>Invalid Operation</type-description>
      <value-value>6</value-value>
      <value-description>PCE-initiated LSP limit reached</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8281"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27">
      <type-value>19</type-value>
      <type-description>Invalid Operation</type-description>
      <value-value>7</value-value>
      <value-description>Delegation for PCE-initiated LSP cannot be revoked</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8281"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27">
      <type-value>19</type-value>
      <type-description>Invalid Operation</type-description>
      <value-value>8</value-value>
      <value-description>Non-zero PLSP-ID in LSP Initiate Request</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8281"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27" updated="2017-11-24">
      <type-value>19</type-value>
      <type-description>Invalid Operation</type-description>
      <value-value>9</value-value>
      <value-description>LSP is not PCE initiated</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8281"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27">
      <type-value>19</type-value>
      <type-description>Invalid Operation</type-description>
      <value-value>10</value-value>
      <value-description>PCE-initiated operation-frequency limit reached</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8281"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2018-04-23">
      <type-value>19</type-value>
      <type-description>Invalid Operation</type-description>
      <value-value>11</value-value>
      <value-description>Attempted LSP State Report
        for P2MP if stateful PCE capability for P2MP was not advertised</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8623"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2018-04-23">
      <type-value>19</type-value>
      <type-description>Invalid Operation</type-description>
      <value-value>12</value-value>
      <value-description>Attempted LSP Update Request
        for P2MP if active stateful PCE capability for P2MP was not advertised</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8623"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2018-04-23">
      <type-value>19</type-value>
      <type-description>Invalid Operation</type-description>
      <value-value>13</value-value>
      <value-description>Attempted LSP Instantiation
        Request for P2MP if stateful PCE
        instantiation capability for P2MP was not advertised</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8623"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-10-08">
      <type-value>19</type-value>
      <type-description>Invalid Operation</type-description>
      <value-value>14</value-value>
      <value-description>Auto-Bandwidth capability was not advertised</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8733"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2020-08-28">
      <type-value>19</type-value>
      <type-description>Invalid Operation</type-description>
      <value-value>15</value-value>
      <value-description>Attempted LSP scheduling while the scheduling capability was not advertised</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8934"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2021-03-11">
      <type-value>19</type-value>
      <type-description>Invalid Operation</type-description>
      <value-value>16</value-value>
      <value-description>Attempted PCECC operations when PCECC capability was not advertised</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9050"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2021-03-11">
      <type-value>19</type-value>
      <type-description>Invalid Operation</type-description>
      <value-value>17</value-value>
      <value-description>Stateful PCE capability was not advertised</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9050"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2021-03-11">
      <type-value>19</type-value>
      <type-description>Invalid Operation</type-description>
      <value-value>18</value-value>
      <value-description>Unknown Label</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9050"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2022-01-12" updated="2024-04-16">
      <type-value>19</type-value>
      <type-description>Invalid Operation</type-description>
      <value-value>19</value-value>
      <value-description>Attempted SRv6 when the capability was not advertised</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9603"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2022-05-09" updated="2026-04-03">
      <type-value>19</type-value>
      <type-description>Invalid Operation</type-description>
      <value-value>20</value-value>
      <value-description>Not supported path backup
        (TEMPORARY - registered 2022-05-09, extension registered 2026-04-03, expires 2027-05-09)
      </value-description>
      <xref type="draft" data="draft-ietf-pce-multipath-07"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2022-05-09" updated="2026-04-03">
      <type-value>19</type-value>
      <type-description>Invalid Operation</type-description>
      <value-value>21</value-value>
      <value-description>Non-empty path
        (TEMPORARY - registered 2022-05-09, extension registered 2026-04-03, expires 2027-05-09)
      </value-description>
      <xref type="draft" data="draft-ietf-pce-multipath-07"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-08-14">
      <type-value>19</type-value>
      <type-description>Invalid Operation</type-description>
      <value-value>22</value-value>
      <value-description>Only one BPI, EPR, or PPA object can be included in this message</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9757"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-08-29" updated="2023-11-30">
      <type-value>19</type-value>
      <type-description>Invalid Operation</type-description>
      <value-value>23</value-value>
      <value-description>LSP state info unavailable for reoptimization</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9504"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-08-29">
      <type-value>19</type-value>
      <type-description>Invalid Operation</type-description>
      <value-value>24</value-value>
      <value-description>LSP state info for route exclusion not found</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9504"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-08-29" updated="2023-11-30">
      <type-value>19</type-value>
      <type-description>Invalid Operation</type-description>
      <value-value>25</value-value>
      <value-description>Attempted LSP update request for GMPLS if stateful PCE capability not advertised</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9504"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-08-29">
      <type-value>19</type-value>
      <type-description>Invalid Operation</type-description>
      <value-value>26</value-value>
      <value-description>Attempted LSP State Report for GMPLS if stateful PCE capability not advertised</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9504"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-08-29" updated="2023-11-30">
      <type-value>19</type-value>
      <type-description>Invalid Operation</type-description>
      <value-value>27</value-value>
      <value-description>Attempted LSP instantiation request for GMPLS if stateful PCE instantiation capability not advertised</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9504"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-08-29" updated="2023-11-30">
      <type-value>19</type-value>
      <type-description>Invalid Operation</type-description>
      <value-value>28</value-value>
      <value-description>Use of the Generalized Endpoint object type for non-GMPLS LSPs</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9504"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2024-09-10">
      <type-value>19</type-value>
      <type-description>Invalid Operation</type-description>
      <value-value>29</value-value>
      <value-description>Attempted Native IP operations when the capability was not advertised</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9757"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2024-09-10">
      <type-value>19</type-value>
      <type-description>Invalid Operation</type-description>
      <value-value>30</value-value>
      <value-description>Unknown Native IP Info</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9757"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2025-03-10">
      <type-value>19</type-value>
      <type-description>Invalid Operation</type-description>
      <value-value>31</value-value>
      <value-description>Invalid Color</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9863"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2025-03-10">
      <type-value>19</type-value>
      <type-description>Invalid Operation</type-description>
      <value-value>32</value-value>
      <value-description>Inconsistent Color</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9863"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2025-10-22">
      <type-value>19</type-value>
      <type-description>Invalid Operation</type-description>
      <value-value>33</value-value>
      <value-description>Attempted use of SR-Algorithm without advertised capability</value-description>
      <xref type="draft" data="RFC-ietf-pce-sid-algo-29"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2025-10-22">
      <type-value>19</type-value>
      <type-description>Invalid Operation</type-description>
      <value-value>34</value-value>
      <value-description>Unsupported combination of constraints</value-description>
      <xref type="draft" data="RFC-ietf-pce-sid-algo-29"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2026-03-25">
      <type-value>19</type-value>
      <type-description>Invalid Operation</type-description>
      <value-value>35</value-value>
      <value-description>Path modification is blocked by constraint</value-description>
      <xref type="draft" data="RFC-ietf-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions-16"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27" updated="2017-06-26">
      <type-value>19</type-value>
      <type-description>Invalid Operation</type-description>
      <value-value>36-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27">
      <type-value>20</type-value>
      <type-description>LSP State Synchronization Error</type-description>
      <value-value>0</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
	  <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27" updated="2017-06-26">
      <type-value>20</type-value>
      <type-description>LSP State Synchronization Error</type-description>
      <value-value>1</value-value>
      <value-description>A PCE indicates to a PCC that it cannot process
        (an otherwise valid) LSP State Report. The PCEP-
        ERROR object is followed by the LSP object
        that identifies the LSP.</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27">
      <type-value>20</type-value>
      <type-description>LSP State Synchronization Error</type-description>
      <value-value>2</value-value>
      <value-description>LSP-DB version mismatch.</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8232"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27">
      <type-value>20</type-value>
      <type-description>LSP State Synchronization Error</type-description>
      <value-value>3</value-value>
      <value-description>Attempt to trigger
        synchronization before PCE
        trigger.</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8232"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27">
      <type-value>20</type-value>
      <type-description>LSP State Synchronization Error</type-description>
      <value-value>4</value-value>
      <value-description>Attempt to trigger a
        synchronization when the
        PCE triggered synchronization
        capability has not been
        advertised.</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8232"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27" updated="2017-06-26">
      <type-value>20</type-value>
      <type-description>LSP State Synchronization Error</type-description>
      <value-value>5</value-value>
      <value-description>A PCC indicates to a PCE that it cannot complete
        the State Synchronization.</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27">
      <type-value>20</type-value>
      <type-description>LSP State Synchronization Error</type-description>
      <value-value>6</value-value>
      <value-description>Received an invalid LSP-DB Version Number.</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8232"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27">
      <type-value>20</type-value>
      <type-description>LSP State Synchronization Error</type-description>
      <value-value>7</value-value>
      <value-description>Received an invalid Speaker Entity Identifier.</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8232"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27" updated="2017-06-26">
      <type-value>20</type-value>
      <type-description>LSP State Synchronization Error</type-description>
      <value-value>8-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
    </record>
    <record date="2015-08-14" updated="2018-05-11">
      <type-value>21</type-value>
      <type-description>Invalid traffic engineering path setup type</type-description>
      <value-value>0</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8408"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2015-08-14" updated="2018-05-11">
      <type-value>21</type-value>
      <type-description>Invalid traffic engineering path setup type</type-description>
      <value-value>1</value-value>
      <value-description>Unsupported path setup type</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8408"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2015-08-14" updated="2018-05-11">
      <type-value>21</type-value>
      <type-description>Invalid traffic engineering path setup type</type-description>
      <value-value>2</value-value>
      <value-description>Mismatched path setup type</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8408"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>21</type-value>
      <type-description>Invalid traffic engineering path setup type</type-description>
      <value-value>3-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>22</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
      <value-value>0-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27" updated="2017-10-18">
      <type-value>23</type-value>
      <type-description>Bad parameter value</type-description>
      <value-value>0</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
	  <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8281"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27" updated="2017-10-18">
      <type-value>23</type-value>
      <type-description>Bad parameter value</type-description>
      <value-value>1</value-value>
      <value-description>SYMBOLIC-PATH-NAME in use</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8281"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27" updated="2017-11-24">
      <type-value>23</type-value>
      <type-description>Bad parameter value</type-description>
      <value-value>2</value-value>
      <value-description>Speaker identity included for an LSP that is not PCE initiated</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8281"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27" updated="2017-10-18">
      <type-value>23</type-value>
      <type-description>Bad parameter value</type-description>
      <value-value>3-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27" updated="2017-10-18">
      <type-value>24</type-value>
      <type-description>LSP instantiation error</type-description>
      <value-value>0</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
	  <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8281"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27" updated="2017-10-18">
      <type-value>24</type-value>
      <type-description>LSP instantiation error</type-description>
      <value-value>1</value-value>
      <value-description>Unacceptable instantiation parameters</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8281"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27" updated="2017-10-18">
      <type-value>24</type-value>
      <type-description>LSP instantiation error</type-description>
      <value-value>2</value-value>
      <value-description>Internal error</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8281"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27">
      <type-value>24</type-value>
      <type-description>LSP instantiation error</type-description>
      <value-value>3</value-value>
      <value-description>Signaling error</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8281"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27" updated="2017-10-18">
      <type-value>24</type-value>
      <type-description>LSP instantiation error</type-description>
      <value-value>4-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-09-07">
      <type-value>25</type-value>
      <type-description>PCEP StartTLS failure</type-description>
      <value-value>0</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
	  <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8253"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-09-07">
      <type-value>25</type-value>
      <type-description>PCEP StartTLS failure</type-description>
      <value-value>1</value-value>
      <value-description>Reception of StartTLS after any PCEP exchange</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8253"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-09-07">
      <type-value>25</type-value>
      <type-description>PCEP StartTLS failure</type-description>
      <value-value>2</value-value>
      <value-description>Reception of any other message apart from StartTLS, Open, or PCErr</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8253"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-09-07">
      <type-value>25</type-value>
      <type-description>PCEP StartTLS failure</type-description>
      <value-value>3</value-value>
      <value-description>Failure, connection without TLS is not possible</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8253"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-09-07">
      <type-value>25</type-value>
      <type-description>PCEP StartTLS failure</type-description>
      <value-value>4</value-value>
      <value-description>Failure, connection without TLS is possible</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8253"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-09-07">
      <type-value>25</type-value>
      <type-description>PCEP StartTLS failure</type-description>
      <value-value>5</value-value>
      <value-description>No StartTLS message (nor PCErr/Open) before StartTLSWait timer expiry</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8253"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-09-07">
      <type-value>25</type-value>
      <type-description>PCEP StartTLS failure</type-description>
      <value-value>6-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-10-17" updated="2019-08-02">
      <type-value>26</type-value>
      <type-description>Association Error</type-description>
      <value-value>0</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8697"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-10-17" updated="2020-01-23">
      <type-value>26</type-value>
      <type-description>Association Error</type-description>
      <value-value>1</value-value>
      <value-description>Association Type is not supported</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8697"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-10-17" updated="2019-08-02">
      <type-value>26</type-value>
      <type-description>Association Error</type-description>
      <value-value>2</value-value>
      <value-description>Too many LSPs in the association group</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8697"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-10-17" updated="2019-08-02">
      <type-value>26</type-value>
      <type-description>Association Error</type-description>
      <value-value>3</value-value>
      <value-description>Too many association groups</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8697"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-10-17" updated="2019-08-02">
      <type-value>26</type-value>
      <type-description>Association Error</type-description>
      <value-value>4</value-value>
      <value-description>Association unknown</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8697"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-10-17" updated="2019-08-02">
      <type-value>26</type-value>
      <type-description>Association Error</type-description>
      <value-value>5</value-value>
      <value-description>Operator-configured association information mismatch</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8697"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-10-17" updated="2019-08-02">
      <type-value>26</type-value>
      <type-description>Association Error</type-description>
      <value-value>6</value-value>
      <value-description>Association information mismatch</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8697"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-10-17" updated="2019-08-02">
      <type-value>26</type-value>
      <type-description>Association Error</type-description>
      <value-value>7</value-value>
      <value-description>Cannot join the association group</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8697"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-08-02" updated="2020-01-23">
      <type-value>26</type-value>
      <type-description>Association Error</type-description>
      <value-value>8</value-value>
      <value-description>Association ID not in range</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8697"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-10-23">
      <type-value>26</type-value>
      <type-description>Association Error</type-description>
      <value-value>9</value-value>
      <value-description>Tunnel ID or End points mismatch for
        Path Protection Association</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8745"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-10-23">
      <type-value>26</type-value>
      <type-description>Association Error</type-description>
      <value-value>10</value-value>
      <value-description>Attempt to add another working/protection LSP 
        for Path Protection Association</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8745"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-10-23">
      <type-value>26</type-value>
      <type-description>Association Error</type-description>
      <value-value>11</value-value>
      <value-description>Protection type is not supported</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8745"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2021-01-28">
      <type-value>26</type-value>
      <type-description>Association Error</type-description>
      <value-value>12</value-value>
      <value-description>Not expecting policy parameters</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9005"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2021-01-28">
      <type-value>26</type-value>
      <type-description>Association Error</type-description>
      <value-value>13</value-value>
      <value-description>Unacceptable policy parameters</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9005"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2021-03-10" updated="2021-06-18">
      <type-value>26</type-value>
      <type-description>Association Error</type-description>
      <value-value>14</value-value>
      <value-description>Association group mismatch</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9059"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2021-03-10" updated="2021-06-18">
      <type-value>26</type-value>
      <type-description>Association Error</type-description>
      <value-value>15</value-value>
      <value-description>Tunnel mismatch in the association group</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9059"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2021-03-10" updated="2021-06-18">
      <type-value>26</type-value>
      <type-description>Association Error</type-description>
      <value-value>16</value-value>
      <value-description>Path Setup Type not supported</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9059"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2021-03-10" updated="2021-06-18">
      <type-value>26</type-value>
      <type-description>Association Error</type-description>
      <value-value>17</value-value>
      <value-description>Bidirectional LSP direction mismatch</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9059"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2021-03-10" updated="2021-06-18">
      <type-value>26</type-value>
      <type-description>Association Error</type-description>
      <value-value>18</value-value>
      <value-description>Bidirectional LSP co-routed mismatch</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9059"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2021-03-10" updated="2021-06-18">
      <type-value>26</type-value>
      <type-description>Association Error</type-description>
      <value-value>19</value-value>
      <value-description>Endpoint mismatch in the association group</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9059"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2024-02-13">
      <type-value>26</type-value>
      <type-description>Association Error</type-description>
      <value-value>20</value-value>
      <value-description>SR Policy Identifiers Mismatch</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9862"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2024-02-13">
      <type-value>26</type-value>
      <type-description>Association Error</type-description>
      <value-value>21</value-value>
      <value-description>SR Policy Candidate Path Identifier Mismatch</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9862"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>26</type-value>
      <type-description>Association Error</type-description>
      <value-value>22-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-25">
      <type-value>27</type-value>
      <type-description>WSON RWA error</type-description>
      <value-value>0</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
	  <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8780"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-25">
      <type-value>27</type-value>
      <type-description>WSON RWA error</type-description>
      <value-value>1</value-value>
      <value-description>Insufficient memory</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8780"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-25">
      <type-value>27</type-value>
      <type-description>WSON RWA error</type-description>
      <value-value>2</value-value>
      <value-description>RWA computation not supported</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8780"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-25">
      <type-value>27</type-value>
      <type-description>WSON RWA error</type-description>
      <value-value>3</value-value>
      <value-description>Syntactical encoding error</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8780"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-25">
      <type-value>27</type-value>
      <type-description>WSON RWA error</type-description>
      <value-value>4-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-06-13">
      <type-value>28</type-value>
      <type-description>H-PCE Error</type-description>
      <value-value>0</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
	  <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8685"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-06-13">
      <type-value>28</type-value>
      <type-description>H-PCE Error</type-description>
      <value-value>1</value-value>
      <value-description>H-PCE Capability not advertised</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8685"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-06-13">
      <type-value>28</type-value>
      <type-description>H-PCE Error</type-description>
      <value-value>2</value-value>
      <value-description>Parent PCE Capability cannot be provided</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8685"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>28</type-value>
      <type-description>H-PCE Error</type-description>
      <value-value>3-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <type-value>29</type-value>
      <type-description>Path computation failure</type-description>
      <value-value>0</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <type-value>29</type-value>
      <type-description>Path computation failure</type-description>
      <value-value>1</value-value>
      <value-description>Unacceptable request message</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <type-value>29</type-value>
      <type-description>Path computation failure</type-description>
      <value-value>2</value-value>
      <value-description>Generalized bandwidth value not supported</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <type-value>29</type-value>
      <type-description>Path computation failure</type-description>
      <value-value>3</value-value>
      <value-description>Label set constraint could not be met</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <type-value>29</type-value>
      <type-description>Path computation failure</type-description>
      <value-value>4</value-value>
      <value-description>Label constraint could not be met</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2020-08-28">
      <type-value>29</type-value>
      <type-description>Path computation failure</type-description>
      <value-value>5</value-value>
      <value-description>Constraints could not be met for some intervals</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8934"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <type-value>29</type-value>
      <type-description>Path computation failure</type-description>
      <value-value>6-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
    </record>
    <record date="2020-11-09">
      <type-value>30</type-value>
      <type-description>FlowSpec error</type-description>
      <value-value>0</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9168"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2020-11-09">
      <type-value>30</type-value>
      <type-description>FlowSpec error</type-description>
      <value-value>1</value-value>
      <value-description>Unsupported FlowSpec</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9168"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <type-value>30</type-value>
      <type-description>FlowSpec error</type-description>
      <value-value>2</value-value>
      <value-description>Malformed FlowSpec</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9168"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <type-value>30</type-value>
      <type-description>FlowSpec error</type-description>
      <value-value>3</value-value>
      <value-description>Unresolvable Conflict</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9168"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <type-value>30</type-value>
      <type-description>FlowSpec error</type-description>
      <value-value>4</value-value>
      <value-description>Unknown FlowSpec</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9168"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2020-08-28">
      <type-value>30</type-value>
      <type-description>FlowSpec error</type-description>
      <value-value>5</value-value>
      <value-description>Unsupported LPM Route</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9168"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <type-value>30</type-value>
      <type-description>FlowSpec error</type-description>
      <value-value>6-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
    </record>
    <record date="2021-03-12">
      <type-value>31</type-value>
      <type-description>PCECC failure</type-description>
      <value-value>0</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9050"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2021-03-12">
      <type-value>31</type-value>
      <type-description>PCECC failure</type-description>
      <value-value>1</value-value>
      <value-description>Label out of range</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9050"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2021-03-12">
      <type-value>31</type-value>
      <type-description>PCECC failure</type-description>
      <value-value>2</value-value>
      <value-description>Instruction failed</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9050"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2021-03-12">
      <type-value>31</type-value>
      <type-description>PCECC failure</type-description>
      <value-value>3</value-value>
      <value-description>Invalid CCI</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9050"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2021-03-12">
      <type-value>31</type-value>
      <type-description>PCECC failure</type-description>
      <value-value>4</value-value>
      <value-description>Unable to allocate the specified CCI</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9050"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2021-03-12">
      <type-value>31</type-value>
      <type-description>PCECC failure</type-description>
      <value-value>5</value-value>
      <value-description>Invalid next-hop information</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9050"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>31</type-value>
      <type-description>FlowSpec error</type-description>
      <value-value>6-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
    </record>
    <record date="2022-03-30">
      <type-value>32</type-value>
      <type-description>Binding label/SID failure</type-description>
      <value-value>0</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9604"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2022-03-30">
      <type-value>32</type-value>
      <type-description>Binding label/SID failure</type-description>
      <value-value>1</value-value>
      <value-description>Invalid SID</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9604"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2022-03-30">
      <type-value>32</type-value>
      <type-description>Binding label/SID failure</type-description>
      <value-value>2</value-value>
      <value-description>Unable to allocate the specified binding value</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9604"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2022-03-30">
      <type-value>32</type-value>
      <type-description>Binding label/SID failure</type-description>
      <value-value>3</value-value>
      <value-description>Unable to allocate a new binding label/SID</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9604"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2022-03-30">
      <type-value>32</type-value>
      <type-description>Binding label/SID failure</type-description>
      <value-value>4</value-value>
      <value-description>Unable to remove the binding value</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9604"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2022-03-30">
      <type-value>32</type-value>
      <type-description>Binding label/SID failure</type-description>
      <value-value>5</value-value>
      <value-description>Inconsistent binding types</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9604"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2022-03-30">
      <type-value>32</type-value>
      <type-description>Binding label/SID failure</type-description>
      <value-value>6-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-08-14">
      <type-value>33</type-value>
      <type-description>Native IP TE failure</type-description>
      <value-value>0</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9757"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-08-14" updated="2024-08-15">
      <type-value>33</type-value>
      <type-description>Native IP TE failure</type-description>
      <value-value>1</value-value>
      <value-description>Local IP is in use</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9757"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-08-14" updated="2024-08-15">
      <type-value>33</type-value>
      <type-description>Native IP TE failure</type-description>
      <value-value>2</value-value>
      <value-description>Remote IP is in use</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9757"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-08-14" updated="2024-08-15">
      <type-value>33</type-value>
      <type-description>Native IP TE failure</type-description>
      <value-value>3</value-value>
      <value-description>Explicit Peer Route Error</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9757"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-08-14" updated="2024-08-15">
      <type-value>33</type-value>
      <type-description>Native IP TE failure</type-description>
      <value-value>4</value-value>
      <value-description>EPR/BPI Peer Info mismatch</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9757"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-08-14" updated="2024-08-15">
      <type-value>33</type-value>
      <type-description>Native IP TE failure</type-description>
      <value-value>5</value-value>
      <value-description>BPI/PPA Address Family mismatch</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9757"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-08-14" updated="2024-08-15">
      <type-value>33</type-value>
      <type-description>Native IP TE failure</type-description>
      <value-value>6</value-value>
      <value-description>PPA/BPI Peer Info mismatch</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9757"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>33</type-value>
      <type-description>Native IP TE failure</type-description>
      <value-value>7-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>34-251</type-value>
      <type-description>Unassigned</type-description>
      <value-value>0-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Unassigned</value-description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <type-value>252-255</type-value>
      <type-description>Reserved for Experimental Use</type-description>
      <value-value>0-255</value-value>
      <value-description>Reserved for Experimental Use</value-description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9756"/>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="pcep-error-object-flag-field">
    <title>PCEP-ERROR Object Flag Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <note>Bits are numbered from bit 0 as the most significant bit.</note>
    <record>
      <value>0-7</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="load-balancing-object-flag-field">
    <title>LOAD-BALANCING Object Flag Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <note>Bits are numbered from bit 0 as the most significant bit.</note>
    <record>
      <value>0-7</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="close-object-reason-field">
    <title>CLOSE Object Reason Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record>
      <value>0</value>
      <description>Reserved</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>1</value>
      <description>No explanation provided</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>2</value>
      <description>DeadTimer expired</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>3</value>
      <description>Reception of a malformed PCEP message</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>4</value>
      <description>Reception of an unacceptable number of unknown requests/replies</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>5</value>
      <description>Reception of an unacceptable number of unrecognized PCEP messages</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>6-255</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="close-object-flag-field">
    <title>CLOSE Object Flag Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <note>Bits are numbered from bit 0 as the most significant bit.</note>
    <record>
      <value>0-7</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
  </registry>

  <registry id="path-key-subobject">
    <title>PATH-KEY Subobjects</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5520"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record>
      <value>1-63</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>64</value>
      <description>Path Key with 32-bit PCE ID</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5520"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>65</value>
      <description>Path Key with 128-bit PCE ID</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5520"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>66-127</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
  </registry>
   
  <registry id="xro-subobject">
    <title>XRO Subobjects</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5521"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record>
      <value>1</value>
      <description>IPv4 prefix</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc3209"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>2</value>
      <description>IPv6 prefix</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc3209"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>3</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>4</value>
      <description>Unnumbered Interface ID</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc3477"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2015-12-23" updated="2016-06-08">
      <value>5</value>
      <description>4-byte AS number</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc7897"/>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc7898"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2015-12-23" updated="2016-01-04">
      <value>6</value>
      <description>OSPF Area ID</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc7897"/>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc7898"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2015-12-23" updated="2016-01-04">
      <value>7</value>
      <description>IS-IS Area ID</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc7897"/>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc7898"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-26">
      <value>8</value>
      <description>Optical Interface Class List</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8780"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-26">
      <value>9</value>
      <description>Client Signal Information</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8780"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <value>10</value>
      <description>Label</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-08-29">
      <value>11</value>
      <description>LSP</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9504"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>12-31</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>32</value>
      <description>Autonomous system number</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc3209"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>33</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>34</value>
      <description>SRLG</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc4874"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>35-63</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>64</value>
      <description>IPv4 Path Key</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5520"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>65</value>
      <description>IPv6 Path Key</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5520"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>66-127</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
  </registry>

  <registry id="xro-flag-field">
    <title>XRO Flag Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5521"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <note>Bits are numbered from bit 0 as the most significant bit.</note>
    <record>
      <value>0-14</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>15</value>
      <description>Fail (F-bit)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5521"/>
    </record>
  </registry>

  <registry id="of">
    <title>Objective Function</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5541"/>
    <range>
      <value>1-1023</value>
      <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    </range>
    <range>
      <value>1024-32767</value>
      <registration_rule>First Come First Served</registration_rule>
    </range>
    <range>
      <value>32768-65535</value>
      <registration_rule>Reserved for Private Use</registration_rule>
    </range>
    <record>
      <value>0</value>
      <description>Reserved</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5541"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>1</value>
      <description>MCP</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5541"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>2</value>
      <description>MLP</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5541"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>3</value>
      <description>MBP</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5541"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>4</value>
      <description>MBC</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5541"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>5</value>
      <description>MLL</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5541"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>6</value>
      <description>MCC</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5541"/>
    </record>
    <record updated="2017-10-16">
      <value>7</value>
      <description>SPT</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8306"/>
    </record>
    <record updated="2017-10-16">
      <value>8</value>
      <description>MCT</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8306"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-09-28">
      <value>9</value>
      <description>Minimum Packet Loss Path (MPLP)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8233"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-09-28">
      <value>10</value>
      <description>Maximum Under-Utilized Path (MUP)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8233"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-09-28">
      <value>11</value>
      <description>Maximum Reserved Under-Utilized Path (MRUP)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8233"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-06-13">
      <value>12</value>
      <description>Minimize the number of Transit Domains (MTD)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8685"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-06-13">
      <value>13</value>
      <description>Minimize the number of Border Nodes (MBN)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8685"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-06-13">
      <value>14</value>
      <description>Minimize the number of Common Transit Domains (MCTD)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8685"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2020-02-11">
      <value>15</value>
      <description>Minimize the number of Shared Links (MSL)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8800"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2020-02-11">
      <value>16</value>
      <description>Minimize the number of Shared SRLGs (MSS)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8800"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2020-02-11">
      <value>17</value>
      <description>Minimize the number of Shared Nodes (MSN)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8800"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>18-32767</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>32768-65535</value>
      <description>Reserved for Private Use</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5541"/>
    </record>
  </registry>

  <registry id="pcep-tlv-type-indicators">
    <title>PCEP TLV Type Indicators</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    <range>
      <value>0-65503</value>
      <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    </range>
    <range>
      <value>65504-65535</value>
      <registration_rule>Experimental Use</registration_rule>
    </range>
    <record>
      <value>0</value>
      <description>Reserved</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>1</value>
      <description>NO-PATH-VECTOR TLV</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record updated="2025-04-02">
      <value>2</value>
      <description>OVERLOADED-DURATION TLV</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
      <xref type="rfc-errata" data="8344"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>3</value>
      <description>REQ-MISSING TLV</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>4</value>
      <description>OF-List</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5541"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>5</value>
      <description>Order TLV</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5557"/>
    </record>
    <record updated="2017-10-16">
      <value>6</value>
      <description>P2MP capable</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8306"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2014-01-23" updated="2015-01-12">
      <value>7</value>
      <description>VENDOR-INFORMATION-TLV</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc7470"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-25">
      <value>8</value>
      <description>Wavelength Selection</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8780"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-25">
      <value>9</value>
      <description>Wavelength Restriction</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8780"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-25">
      <value>10</value>
      <description>Wavelength Allocation</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8780"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-25">
      <value>11</value>
      <description>Optical Interface Class List</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8780"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-25">
      <value>12</value>
      <description>Client Signal Information</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8780"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-06-13">
      <value>13</value>
      <description>H-PCE-CAPABILITY</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8685"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-06-13">
      <value>14</value>
      <description>Domain-ID</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8685"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-06-13">
      <value>15</value>
      <description>H-PCE-FLAG</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8685"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27" updated="2017-06-26">
      <value>16</value>
      <description>STATEFUL-PCE-CAPABILITY</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27" updated="2017-06-26">
      <value>17</value>
      <description>SYMBOLIC-PATH-NAME</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27" updated="2017-06-26">
      <value>18</value>
      <description>IPV4-LSP-IDENTIFIERS</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27" updated="2017-06-26">
      <value>19</value>
      <description>IPV6-LSP-IDENTIFIERS</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27" updated="2017-06-26">
      <value>20</value>
      <description>LSP-ERROR-CODE</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-07-27" updated="2017-06-26">
      <value>21</value>
      <description>RSVP-ERROR-SPEC</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>22</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-03-28">
      <value>23</value>
      <description>LSP-DB-VERSION</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8232"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-03-28">
      <value>24</value>
      <description>SPEAKER-ENTITY-ID</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8232"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>25</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record date="2015-08-14" updated="2019-03-15">
      <value>26</value>
      <description>SR-PCE-CAPABILITY (deprecated)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8664"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>27</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record date="2015-08-14" updated="2018-05-11">
      <value>28</value>
      <description>PATH-SETUP-TYPE</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8408"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-10-17" updated="2019-08-02">
      <value>29</value>
      <description>Operator-configured Association Range</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8697"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-10-17" updated="2019-08-02">
      <value>30</value>
      <description>Global Association Source</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8697"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-10-17" updated="2019-08-02">
      <value>31</value>
      <description>Extended Association ID</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8697"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2018-04-23">
      <value>32</value>
      <description>P2MP-IPV4-LSP-IDENTIFIERS</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8623"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2018-04-23">
      <value>33</value>
      <description>P2MP-IPV6-LSP-IDENTIFIERS</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8623"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2018-05-11">
      <value>34</value>
      <description>PATH-SETUP-TYPE-CAPABILITY</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8408"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-08-02">
      <value>35</value>
      <description>ASSOC-Type-List</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8697"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-10-08">
      <value>36</value>
      <description>AUTO-BANDWIDTH-CAPABILITY</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8733"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-10-08">
      <value>37</value>
      <description>AUTO-BANDWIDTH-ATTRIBUTES</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8733"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-10-23">
      <value>38</value>
      <description>Path Protection Association Group TLV</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8745"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <value>39</value>
      <description>IPV4-ADDRESS</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779">RFC8779, Section 2.5.2.1</xref>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <value>40</value>
      <description>IPV6-ADDRESS</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779">RFC8779, Section 2.5.2.2</xref>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <value>41</value>
      <description>UNNUMBERED-ENDPOINT</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779">RFC8779, Section 2.5.2.3</xref>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <value>42</value>
      <description>LABEL-REQUEST</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779">RFC8779, Section 2.5.2.4</xref>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <value>43</value>
      <description>LABEL-SET</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779">RFC8779, Section 2.5.2.5</xref>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <value>44</value>
      <description>PROTECTION-ATTRIBUTE</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779">RFC8779, Section 2.8</xref>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <value>45</value>
      <description>GMPLS-CAPABILITY</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779">RFC8779, Section 2.1.2</xref>
    </record>
    <record date="2020-02-11">
      <value>46</value>
      <description>DISJOINTNESS-CONFIGURATION</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8800"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2020-02-11">
      <value>47</value>
      <description>DISJOINTNESS-STATUS</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8800"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2020-05-15">
      <value>48</value>
      <description>POLICY-PARAMETERS-TLV</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9005"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2020-08-28">
      <value>49</value>
      <description>SCHED-LSP-ATTRIBUTE</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8934"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2020-08-28">
      <value>50</value>
      <description>SCHED-PD-LSP-ATTRIBUTE</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8934"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2020-11-09">
      <value>51</value>
      <description>PCE-FLOWSPEC-CAPABILITY TLV</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9168"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2020-11-09">
      <value>52</value>
      <description>FLOW FILTER TLV</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9168"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>53</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record date="2021-03-10">
      <value>54</value>
      <description>Bidirectional LSP Association Group TLV</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9059"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2021-03-29" updated="2022-03-30">
      <value>55</value>
      <description>TE-PATH-BINDING</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9604"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2021-03-30">
      <value>56</value>
      <description>SRPOLICY-POL-NAME</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9862"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2021-03-30">
      <value>57</value>
      <description>SRPOLICY-CPATH-ID</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9862"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2021-03-30">
      <value>58</value>
      <description>SRPOLICY-CPATH-NAME</description>
        <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9862"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2021-03-30">
      <value>59</value>
      <description>SRPOLICY-CPATH-PREFERENCE</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9862"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2022-05-09" updated="2026-04-03">
      <value>60</value>
      <description>MULTIPATH-CAP 
        (TEMPORARY - registered 2022-05-09, extension registered 2026-04-03, expires 2027-05-09)</description>
      <xref type="draft" data="draft-ietf-pce-multipath-07"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2022-05-09" updated="2026-04-03">
      <value>61</value>
      <description>MULTIPATH-WEIGHT 
        (TEMPORARY - registered 2022-05-09, extension registered 2026-04-03, expires 2027-05-09)</description>
      <xref type="draft" data="draft-ietf-pce-multipath-07"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2022-05-09" updated="2026-04-03">
      <value>62</value>
      <description>MULTIPATH-BACKUP 
        (TEMPORARY - registered 2022-05-09, extension registered 2026-04-03, expires 2027-05-09)</description>
      <xref type="draft" data="draft-ietf-pce-multipath-07"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2022-05-09" updated="2026-04-03">
      <value>63</value>
      <description>MULTIPATH-OPPDIR-PATH
        (TEMPORARY - registered 2022-05-09, extension registered 2026-04-03, expires 2027-05-09)</description>
      <xref type="draft" data="draft-ietf-pce-multipath-07"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2022-10-31">
      <value>64</value>
      <description>LSP-EXTENDED-FLAG</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9357"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2022-10-31">
      <value>65</value>
      <description>VIRTUAL-NETWORK-TLV</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9358"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-09-13" updated="2025-06-12">
      <value>66</value>
      <description>SR-Algorithm</description>
      <xref type="draft" data="RFC-ietf-pce-sid-algo-29"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-10-30">
      <value>67</value>
      <description>Color</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9863"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2024-02-13">
      <value>68</value>
      <description>COMPUTATION-PRIORITY</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9862"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2024-02-13">
      <value>69</value>
      <description>EXPLICIT-NULL-LABEL-POLICY</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9862"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2024-02-13">
      <value>70</value>
      <description>INVALIDATION</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9862"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2024-02-13">
      <value>71</value>
      <description>SRPOLICY-CAPABILITY</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9862"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2024-02-23" updated="2026-03-25">
      <value>72</value>
      <description>PATH-MODIFICATION TLV</description>
      <xref type="draft" data="RFC-ietf-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions-16"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2024-08-27">
      <value>73</value>
      <description>SR-P2MP-POLICY-CAPABILITY
        (TEMPORARY - registered 2024-08-27, extension registered 2025-07-10, expires 2026-08-27)</description>
      <xref type="draft" data="draft-ietf-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-11"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2024-08-27">
      <value>74</value>
      <description>IPV4-SR-P2MP-INSTANCE-ID TLV
        (TEMPORARY - registered 2024-08-27, extension registered 2025-07-10, expires 2026-08-27)</description>
      <xref type="draft" data="draft-ietf-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-11"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2024-08-27">
      <value>75</value>
      <description>IPV6-SR-P2MP-INSTANCE-ID TLV
        (TEMPORARY - registered 2024-08-27, extension registered 2025-07-10, expires 2026-08-27)</description>
      <xref type="draft" data="draft-ietf-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-11"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>76-65503</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>65504-65535</value>
      <description>Experimental Use</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8356"/>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="no-path-vector-tlv">
    <title>NO-PATH-VECTOR TLV Flag Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <note>Bits are numbered from bit 0 as the most significant bit.</note>
    <record>
      <value>0-9</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record date="2020-02-11">
      <value>10</value>
      <description>Requested disjoint computation not supported</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8800"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2020-02-11">
      <value>11</value>
      <description>Disjoint path not found</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8800"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <value>12</value>
      <description>LOAD-BALANCING could not be performed with the
        bandwidth constraints</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <value>13</value>
      <description>No label resource in range</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <value>14</value>
      <description>No endpoint label resource in range</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <value>15</value>
      <description>No endpoint label resource</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <value>16</value>
      <description>Granularity not supported</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <value>17</value>
      <description>No Resource</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <value>18</value>
      <description>Protection Mismatch</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-06-13">
      <value>19</value>
      <description>Destination is not found in the indicated domain</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8685"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-06-13">
      <value>20</value>
      <description>No available resource in one or more domains</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8685"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-06-13">
      <value>21</value>
      <description>Unresponsive child PCE(s)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8685"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-06-13">
      <value>22</value>
      <description>Destination domain unknown</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8685"/>
    </record>
    <record updated="2019-03-25">
      <value>23</value>
      <description>No RWA constraints met</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8780"/>
    </record>
    <record updated="2017-10-16">
      <value>24</value>
      <description>P2MP Reachability Problem</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8306"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>25</value>
      <description>No GCO solution found</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5557"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>26</value>
      <description>No GCO migration path found</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5557"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>27</value>
      <description>PKS expansion failure</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5520"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>28</value>
      <description>BRPC Path computation chain unavailable</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5441"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>29</value>
      <description>Unknown Source</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>30</value>
      <description>Unknown Destination</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>31</value>
      <description>PCE currently Unavailable</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5440"/>
    </record>
  </registry>

  <registry id="monitoring-object">
    <title>MONITORING Object Flag Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5886"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <note>Bits are numbered from bit 0 as the most significant bit.</note>
    <record>
      <value>0-18</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>19</value>
      <description>Incomplete</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5886"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>20</value>
      <description>Overload</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5886"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>21</value>
      <description>Processing Time</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5886"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>22</value>
      <description>General</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5886"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>23</value>
      <description>Liveness</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5886"/>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="proc-time-object">
    <title>PROC-TIME Object Flag Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5886"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <note>Bits are numbered from bit 0 as the most significant bit.</note>
    <record>
      <value>0-14</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>15</value>
      <description>Estimated</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5886"/>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="overload-object">
    <title>OVERLOAD Object Flag field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5886"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <note>Bits are numbered from bit 0 as the most significant bit.</note>
    <record>
      <value>0-7</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
  </registry>

  <registry id="bu-object-type-field">
    <title>BU Object Type Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8233"/>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9756"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record date="2016-09-28">
      <value>0</value>
      <description>Reserved</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8233"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-09-28">
      <value>1</value>
      <description>LBU (Link Bandwidth Utilization)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8233"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2016-09-28">
      <value>2</value>
      <description>LRBU (Link Residual Bandwidth Utilization)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8233"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>3-255</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="inter-layer-object-path-property-bits">
    <title>Inter-Layer Object Path Property Bits</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8282"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record>
      <value>0-28</value>
      <flag/>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-03-20" updated="2017-11-24">
      <value>29</value>
      <flag>T</flag>
      <description>Triggered Signaling Allowed</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8282"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-03-20">
      <value>30</value>
      <flag>M</flag>
      <description>Multi-Layer Requested</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8282"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-03-20">
      <value>31</value>
      <flag>I</flag>
      <description>Inter-Layer Allowed</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8282"/>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="lsp-object-flag-field">
    <title>LSP Object Flag Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9756"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <note>Bits are numbered from bit 0 as the most significant bit.</note>
    <record date="2021-03-29" updated="2022-03-30">
      <value>0</value>
      <description>PCE-allocation</description>
	  <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9604"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-05-10">
      <value>1</value>
      <description>ERO-compression</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8623"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2018-04-23">
      <value>2</value>
      <description>Fragmentation</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8623"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2018-04-23">
      <value>3</value>
      <description>P2MP</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8623"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-10-18">
      <value>4</value>
      <description>Create</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8281"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-06-26">
      <value>5-7</value>
      <description>Operational (3 bits)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-06-26">
      <value>8</value>
      <description>Administrative</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-06-26">
      <value>9</value>
      <description>Remove</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-06-26">
      <value>10</value>
      <description>SYNC</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-06-26">
      <value>11</value>
      <description>Delegate</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
    </record>
  </registry>
    
  <registry id="stateful-pce-capability-tlv-flag-field">
      <title>STATEFUL-PCE-CAPABILITY TLV Flag Field</title>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9756"/>
      <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
      <note>Bits are numbered from bit 0 as the most significant bit.</note>
      <record>
        <value>0-16</value>
        <description>Unassigned</description>
      </record>
      <record date="2025-01-14">
        <value>17</value>
        <description>RELAX</description>
        <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9753"/>
      </record>
      <record date="2024-02-23" updated="2026-03-25">
        <value>18</value>
        <description>STRICT-PATH-CAPABILITY</description>
        <xref type="draft" data="RFC-ietf-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions-16"/>
      </record>
      <record date="2024-02-23" updated="2026-03-25">
        <value>19</value>
        <description>PATH-MODIFICATION-CAPABILITY</description>
        <xref type="draft" data="RFC-ietf-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions-16"/>
      </record>
      <record date="2023-10-30">
        <value>20</value>
        <description>COLOR-CAPABILITY</description>
        <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9863"/>
      </record>
    <record date="2020-08-28">
      <value>21</value>
      <description>PD-LSP-CAPABILITY (PD-bit)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8934"/>
    </record>
      <record date="2020-08-28">
        <value>22</value>
        <description>LSP-SCHEDULING-CAPABILITY (B-bit)</description>
        <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8934"/>
      </record> 
      <record date="2018-04-23">
        <value>23</value>
        <description>P2MP-LSP-INSTANTIATION-CAPABILITY</description>
        <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8623"/>
      </record>
      <record date="2018-04-23">
        <value>24</value>
        <description>P2MP-LSP-UPDATE-CAPABILITY</description>
        <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8623"/>
      </record>
      <record date="2018-04-23">
        <value>25</value>
        <description>P2MP-CAPABILITY</description>
        <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8623"/>
      </record>
      <record date="2017-06-29">
        <value>26</value>
        <description>TRIGGERED-INITIAL-SYNC</description>
        <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8232"/>
      </record>
      <record date="2017-06-29">
        <value>27</value>
        <description>DELTA-LSP-SYNC-CAPABILITY</description>
        <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8232"/>
      </record>
      <record date="2017-06-29">
        <value>28</value>
        <description>TRIGGERED-RESYNC</description>
        <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8232"/>
      </record>
      <record date="2017-10-18" updated="2017-10-19">
        <value>29</value>
        <description>LSP-INSTANTIATION-CAPABILITY (I)</description>
        <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8281"/>
      </record>
      <record date="2017-06-29">
        <value>30</value>
        <description>INCLUDE-DB-VERSION</description>
        <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8232"/>
      </record>
      <record date="2017-06-26">
        <value>31</value>
        <description>LSP-UPDATE-CAPABILITY</description>
        <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
      </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="lsp-error-code-tlv-error-code-field">
    <title>LSP-ERROR-CODE TLV Error Code Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9756"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record date="2017-06-26">
      <value>0</value>
      <description>Reserved</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-06-26">
      <value>1</value>
      <description>Unknown reason</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-06-26">
      <value>2</value>
      <description>Limit reached for PCE-controlled LSPs</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-06-26">
      <value>3</value>
      <description>Too many pending LSP update requests</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-06-26">
      <value>4</value>
      <description>Unacceptable parameters</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-06-26">
      <value>5</value>
      <description>Internal error</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-06-26">
      <value>6</value>
      <description>LSP administratively brought down</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-06-26">
      <value>7</value>
      <description>LSP preempted</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-06-26">
      <value>8</value>
      <description>RSVP signaling error</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8231"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-10-30">
      <value>9</value>
      <description>Deprecated (Unsupported Color)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9863"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2024-04-16">
      <value>10</value>
      <description>SID Verification fails</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9603"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>11-65535</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="srp-object-flag-field">
    <title>SRP Object Flag Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8281"/>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8786"/>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9756"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record date="2017-10-18">
      <value>0-29</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record> 
    <record date="2019-10-28" updated="2020-03-06">
      <value>30</value>
      <description>LSP Control Request</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8741"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2017-10-18">
      <value>31</value>
      <description>LSP-Remove</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8281"/>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="pcep-path-setup-types">
    <title>PCEP Path Setup Types</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8408"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record date="2018-05-11">
      <value>0</value>
      <description>Path is set up using the RSVP-TE signaling protocol</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8408"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-15">
      <value>1</value>
      <description>Traffic-engineering path is set up using Segment Routing.</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8664"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2021-03-11">
      <value>2</value>
      <description>Traffic engineering path is set up using PCECC mode</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9050"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2022-01-12" updated="2024-04-16">
      <value>3</value>
      <description>Traffic engineering path is set up using SRv6.</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9603"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-08-14">
      <value>4</value>
      <description>Native IP TE Path</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9757"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>5-255</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="pcep-sr-ero-nai-types">
    <title>PCEP SR-ERO NAI Types</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8664"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record date="2019-03-15">
      <value>0</value>
      <description>NAI is absent.</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8664"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-15">
      <value>1</value>
      <description>NAI is an IPv4 node ID.</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8664"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-15">
      <value>2</value>
      <description>NAI is an IPv6 node ID.</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8664"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-15">
      <value>3</value>
      <description>NAI is an IPv4 adjacency.</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8664"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-15">
      <value>4</value>
      <description>NAI is an IPv6 adjacency with global IPv6 addresses.</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8664"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-15">
      <value>5</value>
      <description>NAI is an unnumbered adjacency with IPv4 node IDs.</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8664"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-15">
      <value>6</value>
      <description>NAI is an IPv6 adjacency with link-local IPv6 addresses.</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8664"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>7-15</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="sr-ero-flag-field">
    <title>SR-ERO Flag Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8664"/>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9756"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record>
      <value>0-6</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-09-13" updated="2025-10-22">
      <value>7</value>
      <description>SR-Algorithm Flag (A)</description>
      <xref type="draft" data="RFC-ietf-pce-sid-algo-29"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-15">
      <value>8</value>
      <description>NAI is absent (F)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8664"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-15">
      <value>9</value>
      <description>SID is absent (S)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8664"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-15">
      <value>10</value>
      <description>SID specifies TC, S, and TTL in addition to an MPLS label (C)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8664"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-15">
      <value>11</value>
      <description>SID specifies an MPLS label (M)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8664"/>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="path-setup-type-capability-sub-tlv-type-indicators">
    <title>PATH-SETUP-TYPE-CAPABILITY Sub-TLV Type Indicators</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8664"/>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9756"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record date="2019-03-15">
      <value>0</value>
      <description>Reserved</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8664"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2021-03-11">
      <value>1</value>
      <description>PCECC-CAPABILITY</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9050"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>2-25</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-15">
      <value>26</value>
      <description>SR-PCE-CAPABILITY</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8664"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2022-01-12" updated="2024-04-16">
      <value>27</value>
      <description>SRv6-PCE-CAPABILITY</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9603"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>28-65535</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="sr-capability-flag-field">
    <title>SR Capability Flag Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8664"/>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9756"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record>
      <value>0-4</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-09-13" updated="2025-06-12">
      <value>5</value>
      <description>SR-Algorithm Capability</description>
      <xref type="draft" data="RFC-ietf-pce-sid-algo-29"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-15">
      <value>6</value>
      <description>Node or Adjacency Identifier (NAI) is
        supported (N)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8664"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-15">
      <value>7</value>
      <description>Unlimited Maximum SID Depth (X)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8664"/>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="wa-object-flag-field">
    <title>WA Object Flag Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8780"/>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9756"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record>
      <value>0-14</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-25" updated="2020-07-06">
      <value>15</value>
      <description>Wavelength Allocation Mode</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8780"/>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="wavelength-restriction-constraint-tlv-action-values">
    <title>Wavelength Restriction TLV Action Values</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8780"/>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9756"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record date="2019-03-25">
      <value>0</value>
      <description>Inclusive List</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8780"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-25">
      <value>1</value>
      <description>Inclusive Range</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8780"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>2-255</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="wavelength-allocation-tlv-flag-field">
    <title>Wavelength Allocation TLV Flag Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8780"/>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9756"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record>
      <value>0-14</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-03-25">
      <value>15</value>
      <description>Wavelength Allocation Mode</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8780"/>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="s2ls-object-flag-field">
    <title>S2LS Object Flag Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8623"/>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9756"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record>
      <value>0-28</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-05-10">
      <value>29-31</value>
      <description>Operational (3 bits)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8623"/>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="h-pce-capability-tlv-flag-field">
    <title>H-PCE-CAPABILITY TLV Flag Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8685"/>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9756"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record>
      <value>0-30</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-06-13">
      <value>31</value>
      <description>P (Parent PCE Request bit)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8685"/>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="domain-id-tlv-domain-type">
    <title>Domain-ID TLV Domain Type</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8685"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record date="2019-06-13">
      <value>0</value>
      <description>Reserved</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8685"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-06-13">
      <value>1</value>
      <description>2-byte AS number</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8685"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-06-13">
      <value>2</value>
      <description>4-byte AS number</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8685"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-06-13">
      <value>3</value>
      <description>4-byte OSPF area ID</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8685"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-06-13">
      <value>4</value>
      <description>Variable-length IS-IS area ID</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8685"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>5-255</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="h-pce-flag-tlv-flag-field">
    <title>H-PCE-FLAG TLV Flag Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8685"/>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9756"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record>
      <value>0-29</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-06-13">
      <value>30</value>
      <description>D (Disallow Domain Re-entry bit)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8685"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-06-13">
      <value>31</value>
      <description>S (Domain Sequence bit)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8685"/>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="association-flag-field">
    <title>ASSOCIATION Flag Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8697"/>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9756"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record>
      <value>0-14</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-08-02">
      <value>15</value>
      <description>R (Removal)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8697"/>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="association-type-field">
    <title>ASSOCIATION Type Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8697"/>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9756"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record date="2019-10-23">
      <value>0</value>
      <description>Reserved</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8697"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-10-23">
      <value>1</value>
      <description>Path Protection Association</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8745"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2020-02-11">
      <value>2</value>
      <description>Disjoint Association</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8800"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2020-05-15">
      <value>3</value>
      <description>Policy Association</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9005"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2021-03-10" updated="2021-06-18">
      <value>4</value>
      <description>Single-Sided Bidirectional LSP Association</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9059"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2021-03-10" updated="2021-06-18">
      <value>5</value>
      <description>Double-Sided Bidirectional LSP Association</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9059"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2021-03-30">
      <value>6</value>
      <description>SR Policy Association</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9862"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2022-12-31">
      <value>7</value>
      <description>VN Association</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9358"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-11-30" updated="2026-03-17">
      <value>8</value>
      <description>Bidirectional SR LSP Association</description>
      <xref type="draft" data="RFC-ietf-pce-sr-bidir-path-25"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2024-08-27">
      <value>9</value>
      <description>P2MP SR Policy Association
        (TEMPORARY - registered 2024-08-27, extension registered 2025-07-10, expires 2026-08-27)</description>
      <xref type="draft" data="draft-ietf-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-11"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>10-65535</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="auto-bandwidth-capability-tlv-flag-field">
    <title>AUTO-BANDWIDTH-CAPABILITY TLV Flag Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8733"/>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9756"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record>
      <value>0-31</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="auto-bandwidth-attributes-sub-tlv">
    <title>AUTO-BANDWIDTH-ATTRIBUTES Sub-TLV Types</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8733"/>
    <range>
      <value>0-65503</value>
      <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    </range>
    <range>
      <value>65504-65535</value>
      <registration_rule>Experimental Use</registration_rule>
    </range>
    <record date="2019-10-08">
      <value>0</value>
      <description>Reserved</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8733"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-10-08">
      <value>1</value>
      <description>Sample-Interval</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8733"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-10-08">
      <value>2</value>
      <description>Adjustment-Interval</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8733"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-10-08">
      <value>3</value>
      <description>Down-Adjustment-Interval</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8733"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-10-08">
      <value>4</value>
      <description>Adjustment-Threshold</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8733"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-10-08">
      <value>5</value>
      <description>Adjustment-Threshold-Percentage</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8733"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-10-08">
      <value>6</value>
      <description>Down-Adjustment-Threshold</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8733"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-10-08">
      <value>7</value>
      <description>Down-Adjustment-Threshold-Percentage</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8733"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-10-08">
      <value>8</value>
      <description>Minimum-Bandwidth</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8733"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-10-08">
      <value>9</value>
      <description>Maximum-Bandwidth</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8733"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-10-08">
      <value>10</value>
      <description>Overflow-Threshold</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8733"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-10-08">
      <value>11</value>
      <description>Overflow-Threshold-Percentage</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8733"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-10-08">
      <value>12</value>
      <description>Underflow-Threshold</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8733"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-10-08">
      <value>13</value>
      <description>Underflow-Threshold-Percentage</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8733"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>14-65503</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-10-08">
      <value>65504-65535</value>
      <description>Experimental Use</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8733"/>
    </record>
  </registry>

  <registry id="path-protection-association-group-tlv-flag-field">
    <title>Path Protection Association Group TLV Flag Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8745"/>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9756"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record date="2019-10-23">
      <value>31</value>
      <description>P - PROTECTION-LSP</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8745"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-10-23">
      <value>30</value>
      <description>S - SECONDARY-LSP</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8745"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>6-29</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-10-23">
      <value>0-5</value>
      <description>Protection Type Flags</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8745"/>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="generalized-endpoint-type">
    <title>Generalized Endpoint Types</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779"/>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9756"/>
    <range>
      <value>0-244</value>
      <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    </range>
    <range>
      <value>245-255</value>
      <registration_rule>Experimental Use</registration_rule>
    </range>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <value>0</value>
      <type>Point-to-Point</type>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <value>1</value>
      <type>Point-to-Multipoint with leaf type 1</type>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <value>2</value>
      <type>Point-to-Multipoint with leaf type 2</type>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <value>3</value>
      <type>Point-to-Multipoint with leaf type 3</type>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <value>4</value>
      <type>Point-to-Multipoint with leaf type 4</type>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2024-08-27">
      <value>5</value>
      <type>Point-to-Multipoint with leaf type 5
        (TEMPORARY - registered 2024-08-27, extension registered 2025-07-10, expires 2026-08-27)</type>
      <xref type="draft" data="draft-ietf-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-11"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>6-244</value>
      <type>Unassigned</type>
    </record>
    <record date="2019-12-17">
      <value>245-255</value>
      <type>Experimental Use</type>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779"/>
    </record>
  </registry>

  <registry id="gmpls-capability-tlv-flag-field">
    <title>GMPLS-CAPABILITY TLV Flag Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8779"/>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9756"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record date="2023-08-29">
      <value>31</value>
      <description>LSP-REPORT-CAPABILITY (R)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9504"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-08-29">
      <value>30</value>
      <description>LSP-UPDATE-CAPABILITY (U)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9504"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-08-29">
      <value>29</value>
      <description>LSP-INSTANTIATION-CAPABILITY (I)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9504"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>0-28</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="disjointness-configuration-tlv-flag-field">
    <title>DISJOINTNESS-CONFIGURATION TLV Flag Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8800"/>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9756"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record date="2020-02-11">
      <value>31</value>
      <description>L - Link Diverse</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8800"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2020-02-11">
      <value>30</value>
      <description>N - Node Diverse</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8800"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2020-02-11">
      <value>29</value>
      <description>S - SRLG Diverse</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8800"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2020-02-11">
      <value>28</value>
      <description>P - Shortest Path</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8800"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2020-02-11">
      <value>27</value>
      <description>T - Strict Disjointness</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8800"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>0-26</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
  </registry>

  <registry id="sched-pd-lsp-attribute-tlv-opt-field">
    <title>SCHED-PD-LSP-ATTRIBUTE TLV Opt Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8934"/>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9756"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record date="2020-08-28">
      <value>0</value>
      <description>Reserved</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8934"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2020-08-28">
      <value>1</value>
      <description>REPEAT-EVERY-MONTH</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8934"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2020-08-28">
      <value>2</value>
      <description>REPEAT-EVERY-YEAR</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8934"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2020-08-28">
      <value>3</value>
      <description>REPEAT-EVERY-REPEAT-TIME-LENGTH</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8934"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>4-14</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record date="2020-08-28">
      <value>15</value>
      <description>Reserved</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8934"/>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="schedule-tlvs-flag-field">
    <title>Schedule TLVs Flag Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8934"/>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9756"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record>
      <value>0-3</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record date="2020-08-28">
      <value>4</value>
      <description>Relative Time (R-bit)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8934"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2020-08-28">
      <value>5</value>
      <description>PCC Responsible (C-bit)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8934"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2020-08-28">
      <value>6</value>
      <description>LSP Activated (A-bit)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8934"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2020-08-28">
      <value>7</value>
      <description>Grace Period Included (G-bit)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc8934"/>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="flowspec-object-flag-field">
    <title>FLOWSPEC Object Flag Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9168"/>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9756"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record>
      <value>0-5</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record date="2020-11-09">
      <value>6</value>
      <description>LPM (L bit)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9168"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2020-11-09">
      <value>7</value>
      <description>Remove (R bit)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9168"/>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="flow-specification-tlv-type-indicators">
    <title>PCEP Flow Specification TLV Type Indicators</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9168"/>
    <range>
      <value>0-255</value>
      <registration_rule>Reserved</registration_rule>
	  <note>Must not be allocated. Usage mirrors the BGP Flowspec registry.</note>
    </range>
    <range>
      <value>256-64506</value>
      <registration_rule>Specification Required</registration_rule>
    </range>
    <range>
      <value>64507-65531</value>
      <registration_rule>First Come First Served</registration_rule>
    </range>
    <range>
      <value>65532-65535</value>
      <registration_rule>Experimental Use</registration_rule>
    </range>
    <record>
      <value>0-255</value>
      <meaning>Reserved. Must not be allocated. Usage mirrors the BGP FlowSpec registry <xref type="draft" data="draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-27"/> and <xref type="draft" data="draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-19"/></meaning>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9168"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2020-11-09">
      <value>256</value>
      <meaning>Route Distinguisher</meaning>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9168"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2020-11-09">
      <value>257</value>
      <meaning>IPv4 Multicast</meaning>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9168"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2020-11-09">
      <value>258</value>
      <meaning>IPv6 Multicast</meaning>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9168"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>259-65531</value>
      <meaning>Unassigned</meaning>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>65532-65535</value>
      <meaning>Experimental Use</meaning>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9168"/>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="bidirectional-lsp-association-group">
    <title>Bidirectional LSP Association Group TLV Flag Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9059"/>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9756"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record>
      <value>0-29</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record date="2021-03-10">
      <value>30</value>
      <description>C - Co-routed Path</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9059"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2021-03-10">
      <value>31</value>
      <description>R - Reverse LSP</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9059"/>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="pcecc-capability">
    <title>PCECC-CAPABILITY sub-TLV</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9050"/>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9756"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record>
      <value>0-29</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-08-14">
      <value>30</value>
      <description>Native IP</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9757"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2021-03-11">
      <value>31</value>
      <description>Label</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9050"/>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="cci-object-flag-field-mpls-label">
    <title>CCI Object Flag Field for MPLS Label</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9050"/>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9756"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record>
      <value>0-13</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record date="2021-03-11">
      <value>14</value>
      <description>C Bit - PCC allocation</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9050"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2021-03-10">
      <value>15</value>
      <description>O Bit - Specifies label is out-label</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9050"/>
    </record>
  </registry>

  <registry id="te-path-binding-tlv-bt">
    <title>TE-PATH-BINDING TLV BT Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9604"/>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9756"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record date="2022-03-30">
      <value>0</value>
      <description>MPLS Label</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9604"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2022-03-30">
      <value>1</value>
      <description>MPLS Label Stack Entry</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9604"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2022-03-30">
      <value>2</value>
      <description>SRv6 SID</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9604"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2022-03-30">
      <value>3</value>
      <description>SRv6 SID with Behavior and Structure</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9604"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>4-255</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
  </registry>

  <registry id="te-path-binding-tlv-flags">
    <title>TE-PATH-BINDING TLV Flag Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9604"/>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9756"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record date="2022-03-30">
      <value>0</value>
      <description>R (Removal)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9604"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2024-02-13" updated="2025-04-28">
      <value>1</value>
      <description>Deprecated (Specified-BSID-only)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9862"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>2-7</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
  </registry>

  <registry id="lsp-extended-flag-tlv-flags">
    <title>LSP-EXTENDED-FLAG TLV Flag Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9357"/>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9756"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record date="2023-08-29">
      <value>0</value>
      <description>GMPLS LSP (G)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9504"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-08-29" updated="2023-11-30">
      <value>1</value>
      <description>Bidirectional Co-routed LSP (B)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9504"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2023-08-29" updated="2023-11-30">
      <value>2-3</value>
      <description>Routing Granularity (RG)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9504"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2024-02-23" updated="2026-03-25">
      <value>4</value>
      <description>Strict-Path Flag (O)</description>
      <xref type="draft" data="RFC-ietf-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions-16"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>5-31</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="lsp-exclusion-sub-object-flag-field">
    <title>LSP Exclusion Subobject Flag Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9504"/>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9756"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record>
      <value>0-7</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
  </registry>

  <registry id="pcep-srv6-ero-nai-types">
    <title>PCEP SRv6-ERO NAI Types</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9603"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record date="2024-04-16">
      <value>0</value>
      <description>NAI is absent.</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9603"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>1</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record date="2024-04-16">
      <value>2</value>
      <description>NAI is an IPv6 node ID.</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9603"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>3</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record date="2024-04-16">
      <value>4</value>
      <description>NAI is an IPv6 adjacency with global IPv6 addresses.</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9603"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>5</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record date="2024-04-16">
      <value>6</value>
      <description>NAI is an IPv6 adjacency with link-local IPv6 addresses.</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9603"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>7-15</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
  </registry>

  <registry id="srv6-ero-flag-field">
    <title>SRv6-ERO Flag Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9603"/>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9756"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record>
      <value>0-6</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record date="2025-10-22">
      <value>7</value>
      <description>SR-Algorithm Flag (A)</description>
      <xref type="draft" data="RFC-ietf-pce-sid-algo-29"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2024-04-16">
      <value>8</value>
      <description>SID Verification (V)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9603"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2024-04-16">
      <value>9</value>
      <description>SID Structure is present (T)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9603"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2024-04-16">
      <value>10</value>
      <description>NAI is absent (F)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9603"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2024-04-16">
      <value>11</value>
      <description>SID is absent (S)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9603"/>
    </record>
  </registry>

  <registry id="srv6-capability-flag-field">
    <title>SRv6 Capability Flag Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9603"/>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9756"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record>
      <value>0-12</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record date="2025-10-22">
      <value>13</value>
      <description>SR-Algorithm Capability</description>
      <xref type="draft" data="RFC-ietf-pce-sid-algo-29"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2024-04-16">
      <value>14</value>
      <description>Node or Adjacency Identifier (NAI) is supported (N)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9603"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>15</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
  </registry>

  <registry id="cci-object-flag-field-native-ip">
    <title>CCI Object Flag Field for Native IP</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9757"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record>
      <value>0-15</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
  </registry>

  <registry id="bpi-object-status-code-field">
    <title>BPI Object Status Code Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9757"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record date="2024-09-10">
      <value>0</value>
      <description>Reserved</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9757"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2024-09-10">
      <value>1</value>
      <description>BGP Session Established</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9757"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2024-09-10">
      <value>2</value>
      <description>BGP Session Establishment In Progress</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9757"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2024-09-10">
      <value>3</value>
      <description>BGP Session Down </description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9757"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>4-255</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
  </registry>

  <registry id="bpi-object-error-code-field">
    <title>BPI Object Error Code Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9757"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record date="2024-09-10">
      <value>0</value>
      <description>Reserved</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9757"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2024-09-10">
      <value>1</value>
      <description>ASes do not match - BGP Session Failure</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9757"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2024-09-10">
      <value>2</value>
      <description>Peer IP can't be reached - BGP Session Failure</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9757"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>3-255</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
  </registry>

  <registry id="bpi-object-flag-field">
    <title>BPI Object Flag Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9757"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record>
      <value>0-6</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record date="2024-09-10">
      <value>7</value>
      <description>T (IP-in-IP) bit</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9757"/>
    </record>
  </registry>

  <registry id="sr-policy-invalidation-operational-flags">
    <title>SR Policy Invalidation Operational Flags</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9862"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record>
      <value>0-6</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record date="2025-04-28" updated="2025-10-21">
      <value>7</value>
      <description>D: Dropping - the LSP is actively dropping traffic as a result of Drop-Upon-Invalid behavior being activated.</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9862"/>
    </record>
  </registry>

  <registry id="sr-policy-invalidation-configuration-flags">
    <title>SR Policy Invalidation Configuration Flags</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9862"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record>
      <value>0-6</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record date="2025-04-28" updated="2025-10-21">
      <value>7</value>
      <description>D: Drop enabled - the Candidate Path has Drop-Upon-Invalid feature enabled.</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9862"/>
    </record>
  </registry>

  <registry id="sr-policy-capability-tlv-flag-field">
    <title>SR Policy Capability TLV Flag Field</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9862"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record>
      <value>0-26</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record date="2025-04-28">
      <value>27</value>
      <description>Stateless Operation (L-flag)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9862"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>28</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record date="2025-04-28">
      <value>29</value>
      <description>Invalidation (I-flag)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9862"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2025-04-28">
      <value>30</value>
      <description>Explicit NULL Label Policy (E-flag)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9862"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2025-04-28">
      <value>31</value>
      <description>Computation Priority (P-flag)</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc9862"/>
    </record>
  </registry>

  <registry id="path-modification-tlv-flag-field">
    <title>PATH-MODIFICATION TLV Flag Field</title>
    <xref type="draft" data="RFC-ietf-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions-16"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record>
      <value>0-13</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record date="2026-03-25">
      <value>14</value>
      <description>Permanent (P)</description>
      <xref type="draft" data="RFC-ietf-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions-16"/>
    </record>
    <record date="2026-03-25">
      <value>15</value>
      <description>Force (F)</description>
      <xref type="draft" data="RFC-ietf-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions-16"/>
    </record>
  </registry>

  <people/>
</registry>
